Re: [HACKERS] Proposed change to the JDBC driver - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Mount
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Proposed change to the JDBC driver
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.10.10001241816480.4761-100000@maidast.retep.org.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Proposed change to the JDBC driver  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> Peter Mount <peter@retep.org.uk> writes:
> > As I haven't seen any replies to this, can I assume no body objects to me
> > making this fairly major change to the driver?
> 
> AFAICS, it's not "major" in the sense of a functionality change, it's
> just that each calling app will need to replace "postgresql" with
> "org.postgresql"?

Correct.

> If you're gonna do it, 7.0 seems like the right time to do it.

That's exactly why I wanted to do it now.

Peter

--      Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk     Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Faq: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgresJava PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns