Re: vacuum timings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: vacuum timings
Date
Msg-id 16498.948481591@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: vacuum timings  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses RE: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum timings
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Conclusions:
>     o  indexes never get smaller

Which we knew...

>     o  drop/recreate index is slower than vacuum of indexes

Quite a few people have reported finding the opposite in practice.
You should probably try vacuuming after deleting or updating some
fraction of the rows, rather than just the all or none cases.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: set command
Next
From: Patrick Welche
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Variable case database names