Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone?
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.02A.10001201231021.15489-100000@Puma.DoCS.UU.SE
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone?  (Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> also... to accomplish the gperf testing I do a strlen on each word,
> over and over to simulate the need for it (as gperf needs that)
> however if the strlen is already available in the parser at this
> time, i'm pretty sure it would be even faster.

Precisely, that was the idea.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone?