Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0001291215400.364-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT
Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT
List pgsql-hackers
On 2000-01-28, Tom Lane mentioned:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > I'd like to yank the END/ABORT commands, since they're non-standard and
> > redundant (COMMIT/ROLLBACK). Anyone who could not bear to see them go?
> 
> Exactly what will this accomplish, other than breaking a lot of existing
> applications?  (Including all of mine, which no doubt biases my thinking.)

Okay, I was just wondering. But I'm going to change all the notices and
docs to use commit and rollback instead.


-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TODO list check
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Does initdb -e is working ? (Latest dev. snapshot)