Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM VERBOSE ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM VERBOSE ...
Date
Msg-id 10184.947434651@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to VACUUM VERBOSE ...  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM VERBOSE ...
List pgsql-hackers
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> NOTICE:  Index word_url: Pages 16645; Tuples 5004183. Elapsed 3/9 sec.

> I'm curious about the Elapsed ... it took several minutes to before that
> pop'd up on the screen, which is why I ask...

That'd been bothering me too.  A glance at the vacuum code makes it
clear that what's being reported is not elapsed time at all: the numbers
are user and system CPU time.  OK, that's cool, but the wording of the
notice message needs to be changed to identify the numbers correctly.

Do we need to have actual wall clock time in there too?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ...
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ...