Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hannu Krosing
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS
Date
Msg-id 389564D5.1195BC3F@tm.ee
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > > > I thought that the original berkeley doco covered this to some extent.
> > >
> > > Where would I find that?
> >
> > No offence intended guys, but I'm a bit shocked that you're all hacking
> > on
> > postgres without having read the design docs. The design docs are
> > extremely cool and I'd personally like to see the database return
> > to the glory days of all this cool technology, features and ideas.
> > (Hey wouldn't even mind if it went back to postquel hey hey :)
> 
> Suppy and demand.  We little demand for fancy features, and huge demand
> for SQL standard features.

And even bigger demand for stability and speed (in this order);)

Once we have both to some high level (which we mostly have now) the demand
for fancyness will no doubt return.

----------
Hannu


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Help with pl/pgsql, triggers, and foreign keys
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!?