Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS
Date
Msg-id 200001310111.UAA22887@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS  (Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > > I thought that the original berkeley doco covered this to some extent.
> > 
> > Where would I find that?
> 
> No offence intended guys, but I'm a bit shocked that you're all hacking
> on
> postgres without having read the design docs. The design docs are
> extremely cool and I'd personally like to see the database return
> to the glory days of all this cool technology, features and ideas.
> (Hey wouldn't even mind if it went back to postquel hey hey :)

Suppy and demand.  We little demand for fancy features, and huge demand
for SQL standard features.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem