Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable
Date
Msg-id 3407.947520146@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> * new to old: fails for every case except where there's exactly 8
>> non zero entries.

> Not sure about this.  Old code did sscanf on 8 entries, but if it
> returned fewer, it padded with zeros, so new->old should work.

Oh, OK.  Nevermind then...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable
Next
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: Simmultanous Connections (fwd)