Philip Warner wrote:
> >In fact, this is a KEY notion behind RDBMS systems...queries return an
> >unordered set, pure and simple, unless you supply an "order" clause
> >(though "group by" appears to be implemented by ordering in various
> >RDBMS systems, that's an efficiency hack not a given AFAIK).
On second thoughts, maybe I agree DISTINCT ON should be dumped. In my
example, if I wanted the youngest people with a given name sorted oldest
first things would be confusing. It's an inconsistant command, I can see
that now.
