Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version
Date
Msg-id 3155.947517764@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Shared library version  ("Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version
Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version
Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version
List pgsql-hackers
"Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk> writes:
> There appear to have been changes in the shared library libpq.
> Since the library has changed, it needs to have a new version number.

You're right, we need to bump the number before release (and I hope we
remember!).  Past practice has not been to bump the number during
development cycles, since we'd shortly have ridiculously high version
numbers if we incremented them at every development change.

libpq++ has also had API changes requiring a new version number before
release, I think --- any others?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable