Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Oliver Elphick
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version
Date
Msg-id 200001110940.JAA28524@linda.lfix.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote: >"Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk> writes: >> There appear to have been changes in the shared library
libpq.>> Since the library has changed, it needs to have a new version number. > >You're right, we need to bump the
numberbefore release (and I hope we >remember!).  Past practice has not been to bump the number during >development
cycles,since we'd shortly have ridiculously high version >numbers if we incremented them at every development change.
 

Yes, but it should be bumped the first time it changes; I agree that it 
need not be increased during later development of the same release.

A patch would be superfluous.  The necessary change is simply to
increment SO_MINOR_VERSION in src/interfaces/libpq/Makefile

-- 
Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight                              http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver              PGP key from public servers; key
ID32B8FAA1                ========================================    "Enter into his gates with thanksgiving, and into
his     courts with praise. Be thankful unto him, and bless      his name."           Psalms 100:4 
 




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version
Next
From: Mateus Cordeiro Inssa
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Simmultanous Connections (fwd)