At 03:08 AM 1/15/00 +0000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>I'd be a little reluctant to give up the alternate "::" syntax, only
>because I'm not sure I trust the standards folks to not stomp on the
>alternative at some point in the future. (Sorry about the
>double-negative, but it says what I mean :)
Which begs the question ... does Postgres.org have representation
on the standards commitees?
Whether or not there's money available for development, I should
think minimal funding for participation in the standards committee
(i.e. travel and per-diem, maybe not a salary) wouldn't be hard to
scare up...
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
