ORDBMS<->OID (Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject ORDBMS<->OID (Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping)
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.21.0001240052020.79710-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping  (Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Chris Bitmead wrote:

> Hannu Krosing wrote:
> 
> > I'm sure many people would appreciate it even without "preserving oid-s"
> > as OID's are declared deprecated for (AFAIK) >2 years, 
> 
> OIDs should not be deprecated (never heard that one before). They will
> become more important if and when postgres moves more toward being an
> odbms. For reasons see any book on object theory and identity.

You are the second person that mentioned the ODBMS<->OID tie in ... when
you say ODBMS, is that the same as ORDBMS, or we talking a different
issue?

Want to elaborate?  Like, since we already have the 'core', I believe,
what does it take to continue that trend?

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping
Next
From: Don Baccus
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Implementing STDDEV and VARIANCE