Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace
Date
Msg-id 200001262316.SAA29624@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-sql
> Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com> writes:
> > As long as we're fixing the syntax, I'm wondering if it wouldn't be more
> > logical to have DISTINCT ON somewhere later in the syntax.
> 
> Well, SELECT DISTINCT is that way because SQL92 says so.  Putting the
> DISTINCT ON variant somewhere else might be logically purer, but I think
> it'd be confusing.
> 
> Also, isn't the reason we have DISTINCT ON at all that it's there to
> be compatible with MySQL or someone?  I figured adding parens would be
> about the least-surprising variant syntax for a person used to those
> other products.
> 

Makes sense to me.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace
Next
From: Chris Bitmead
Date:
Subject: Ars Digita and PostgreSQL