Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0001180145290.411-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2000-01-17, Tom Lane mentioned:

> > Hmm, maybe this is not what I meant. I meant adding the linking line to
> > pg_dump, not libpq.
> 
> Not a usable answer: that would mean that *every* application using
> libpq would have to start including backend/port/snprintf.o, on the
> platforms where vsnprintf doesn't exist.

Nevermind. I got it all backwards.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Foreign keys: unexpected result from ALTER TABLE... ADD CONSTRAINT...