Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0001192044260.5544-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone?
List pgsql-hackers
On 2000-01-18, Bruce Momjian mentioned:

> Can you run our keywords.c using our method and gperf and see if there
> is any speed difference?

It seems to have a speed advantage of about 2.5. But in practice that
means that 1 million words take half a second. It's not a big deal to me,
I was just wondering before I throw it out. I guess it really only makes a
difference for compilers, which operate on 1000+ lines.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Patrick Welche
Date:
Subject: pg_dump disaster
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone?