Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

19 January 2000

• 00:05   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 00:15   Re: [HACKERS] date/time problem in v6.5.3 and 7.0.0 ... Thomas Lockhart
• 00:19   RE: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:20   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed (filepath as symlink) Thomas Lockhart
• 00:23   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed (filepath as symlink) Bruce Momjian
• 00:24   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Don Baccus
• 00:29   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed (filepath as symlink) Don Baccus
• 00:46   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 00:52   Re: [HACKERS] pg_proc.h changed Peter Eisentraut
• 00:52   Date/time types (Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include/catalog (pg_type.h)) Peter Eisentraut
• 00:53   Re: [HACKERS] Cannot compile psql Peter Eisentraut
• 00:54   Re: [HACKERS] multi-byte support broken in current Peter Eisentraut
• 00:59   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 01:06   RE: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:09   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 01:22   Re: Date/time types (Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include/catalog(pg_type.h)) Thomas Lockhart
• 01:22   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 01:43   Status on 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 02:39   Re: [HACKERS] multi-byte support broken in current Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:42   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Tom Lane
• 02:57   Well... Vadim Mikheev
• 03:10   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Alfred Perlstein
• 05:23   examples not included mr_hopkins@earthlink.net (Micheal H.)
• 06:06   Re: [HACKERS] Status on 7.0 Hannu Krosing
• 06:19   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Michael Meskes
• 06:20   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Michael Meskes
• 06:20   Re: [HACKERS] patches list Michael Meskes
• 06:20   Re: [HACKERS] Cannot compile psql Michael Meskes
• 06:43   Solaris breakage - lastest CVS Keith Parks
• 06:43   RE: [PATCHES] Patch for Win32 support Magnus Hagander
• 08:24   Daily regression testing via vmware - useful? Stephen Birch
• 08:48   AW: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed (filepath as symlink) Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:31   RE: [HACKERS] Status on 7.0 Peter Mount
• 09:42   RE: [HACKERS] Daily regression testing via vmware - useful? Ansley, Michael
• 09:53   Proposed change to the JDBC driver Peter Mount
• 09:58   RE: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed (filepath as symlink) Ansley, Michael
• 10:15   RE: [HACKERS] Daily regression testing via vmware - useful? Peter Mount
• 11:38   Re: [HACKERS] date/time problem in v6.5.3 and 7.0.0 ... Jose Soares
• 12:02   Re: [HACKERS] Solaris breakage - lastest CVS Bruce Momjian
• 12:56   Re: [HACKERS] Cannot compile psql Tom Lane
• 13:20   Re: Status on 7.0 Thomas Lockhart
• 13:33   Re: Status on 7.0 Thomas Lockhart
• 13:35   Should cast to CHAR or NUMERIC enforce default length limit? Tom Lane
• 13:51   Re: [HACKERS] Daily regression testing via vmware - useful? Tom Lane
• 14:16   Re: [HACKERS] Should cast to CHAR or NUMERIC enforce default length limit? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:27   (no subject) Sevo Stille
• 14:53   running two servers on one machine Kurt Seel
• 15:25   Re: [HACKERS] Should cast to CHAR or NUMERIC enforce default length limit? Bruce Momjian
• 15:34   Re: [HACKERS] Should cast to CHAR or NUMERIC enforce default length limit? Tom Lane
• 15:44   Re: [HACKERS] running two servers on one machine Tom Lane
• 17:17   Re: [HACKERS] Cannot compile psql Michael Meskes
• 17:17   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Don Baccus
• 17:25   pg_dump disaster Patrick Welche
• 18:05   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Peter Eisentraut
• 18:13   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Peter Eisentraut
• 18:14   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Bruce Momjian
• 18:23   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? The Hermit Hacker
• 18:50   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Alfred Perlstein
• 19:07   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed (filepath assymlink) Dmitry Samersoff
• 19:31   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Dmitry Samersoff
• 19:33   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 19:43   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Dmitry Samersoff
• 19:52   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 20:29   Re: [HACKERS] Cannot compile psql Tom Lane
• 21:15   RE: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Hiroshi Inoue
• 21:41   initdb problems on Solaris Keith Parks
• 21:56   Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris Keith Parks
• 22:11   Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris Tom Lane