Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 February 2000

• 00:02   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Bruce Momjian
• 00:02   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Bruce Momjian
• 00:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] Attribute 'aggtransfn1' is repeated Bruce Momjian
• 00:03   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane
• 00:04   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Bruce Momjian
• 00:04   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Bruce Momjian
• 00:04   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Bruce Momjian
• 00:04   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Bruce Momjian
• 00:04   Re: [HACKERS] float4 confused as int?? Tom Lane
• 00:05   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? The Hermit Hacker
• 00:07   Re: [HACKERS] Recent RI changes have broken something Tom Lane
• 00:30   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Thomas Lockhart
• 00:34   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? The Hermit Hacker
• 00:37   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Bruce Momjian
• 00:38   Re: [HACKERS] request for tuning suggestions from PC Week Labs Tom Lane
• 00:46   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql The Hermit Hacker
• 00:47   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Don Baccus
• 01:09   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Tom Lane
• 01:11   reduce pg_hba.conf restrictions ... The Hermit Hacker
• 01:15   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Tom Lane
• 01:16   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Bruce Momjian
• 01:18   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? The Hermit Hacker
• 01:21   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Lamar Owen
• 01:25   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql The Hermit Hacker
• 01:29   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Bruce Momjian
• 01:31   RE: [HACKERS] reduce pg_hba.conf restrictions ... Vince Vielhaber
• 01:35   RE: [HACKERS] reduce pg_hba.conf restrictions ... The Hermit Hacker
• 01:39   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Bruce Momjian
• 01:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Bruce Momjian
• 01:44   Re: [HACKERS] reduce pg_hba.conf restrictions ... Tom Lane
• 01:53   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Tom Lane
• 03:23   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Don Baccus
• 03:25   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Don Baccus
• 05:50   union in an in clause and timestamp Brian Hirt
• 08:22   Re: [HACKERS] Recent RI changes have broken something Oliver Elphick
• 09:14   majordomo Chris
• 10:15   Problem in current CVS Chris
• 11:23   Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Jose Soares
• 11:54   Re: [HACKERS] Problem in current CVS Bruce Momjian
• 12:07   Re: [HACKERS] Problem in current CVS Chris
• 13:05   plpgsql problem.. Mitch Vincent
• 13:24   Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql problem.. Sevo Stille
• 13:28   Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql problem.. Mitch Vincent
• 13:43   Re: [HACKERS] float4 confused as int?? Ed Loehr
• 13:56   Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql problem.. Mitch Vincent
• 14:08   Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Don Baccus
• 14:09   Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql problem.. Tom Lane
• 14:17   Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql problem.. Sevo Stille
• 14:27   Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql problem.. Mitch Vincent
• 14:38   Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql problem.. Tom Lane
• 15:02   Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql problem.. wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:04   Re: [HACKERS] PCLabs Survey, Part V: Programmability Michael Meskes
• 15:04   Re: [HACKERS] PCLabs Survey, Part VII: Embedded Database / Branch Office Support Michael Meskes
• 15:47   Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql problem.. Mitch Vincent
• 16:59   Win NT Binary Jeff MacDonald
• 19:22   Re: [HACKERS] PCLabs Survey, Part VII: Embedded Database / Branch Office Support Dmitry Samersoff
• 22:15   Re: [HACKERS] Win NT Binary Yutaka tanida

2 February 2000

• 00:25   RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856 Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:03   SELECT FOR UPDATE leaks relation refcounts Tom Lane
• 01:53   Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856 Tom Lane
• 02:10   Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql problem.. Tom Lane
• 03:54   Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856 Don Baccus
• 04:10   Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856 The Hermit Hacker
• 04:21   Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856 Ross J. Reedstrom
• 04:26   Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856 Bruce Momjian
• 04:32   Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856 Bruce Momjian
• 04:58   Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856 Tom Lane
• 05:47   Re: [HACKERS] PCLabs Survey, Part VII: Embedded Database / Branch Office Support Michael Meskes
• 06:49   AW: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:44   RE: [HACKERS] PCLabs Survey, Part VII: Embedded Database / Branch Office Support Horák Daniel
• 09:38   Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856 Peter Eisentraut
• 11:12   Re: AW: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? The Hermit Hacker
• 12:02   WinNT compiling: ongoing Jeff MacDonald
• 12:08   RE: [HACKERS] WinNT compiling: ongoing Horák Daniel
• 13:04   Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856 Don Baccus
• 16:25   Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856 Lamar Owen
• 18:07   Re: [HACKERS] RE: cvs-commit-digest V1 #856 Ross J. Reedstrom
• 22:05   Re: [HACKERS] Recent RI changes have broken something Tom Lane
• 22:08   RE: [HACKERS] SELECT FOR UPDATE leaks relation refcounts Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:00   Re: [HACKERS] SELECT FOR UPDATE leaks relation refcounts Tom Lane
• 23:18   Re: [HACKERS] union in an in clause and timestamp Tom Lane
• 23:34   Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris Bitmead

3 February 2000

• 00:16   RE: [HACKERS] SELECT FOR UPDATE leaks relation refcounts Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:31   Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 00:49   Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris Bitmead
• 00:56   Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 00:58   Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 01:11   Re: [HACKERS] SELECT FOR UPDATE leaks relation refcounts Tom Lane
• 01:40   Re: [SQL] Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 01:42   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL The Hermit Hacker
• 01:45   Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris Bitmead
• 01:52   Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris Bitmead
• 02:03   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 02:04   Re: [SQL] Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris Bitmead
• 02:04   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris Bitmead
• 02:04   Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 02:06   Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 02:14   Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris Bitmead
• 02:23   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 03:14   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Don Baccus
• 03:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris Bitmead
• 04:11   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris Bitmead
• 04:27   Re: [SQL] Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Mathijs Brands
• 04:35   Re: [SQL] Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris Bitmead
• 05:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 07:18   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris
• 07:53   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Hannu Krosing
• 07:59   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Hannu Krosing
• 08:04   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Hannu Krosing
• 08:24   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Hannu Krosing
• 08:49   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris
• 09:05   Re: [HACKERS] SELECT FOR UPDATE leaks relation refcounts wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 09:27   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Patrick Welche
• 10:15   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Patrick Welche
• 10:21   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 10:22   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 10:25   Re: [HACKERS] SELECT FOR UPDATE leaks relation refcounts Bruce Momjian
• 10:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris
• 11:03   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 11:08   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris
• 11:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 11:39   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Mark Hollomon
• 11:53   ... O Nubeiro
• 12:48   AW: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:06   Re: [HACKERS] Recent RI changes have broken something Oliver Elphick
• 13:25   AW: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:31   AW: [HACKERS] SELECT FOR UPDATE leaks relation refcounts Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:52   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Don Baccus
• 13:52   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Don Baccus
• 13:54   SERIAL type isn't listed...? The Hermit Hacker
• 14:24   Re: [HACKERS] SERIAL type isn't listed...? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:27   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 14:27   Re: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Peter Eisentraut
• 14:28   Re: [HACKERS] SERIAL type isn't listed...? Peter Eisentraut
• 14:31   array operators to the main tree Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 14:36   Parser/planner and column aliases Thomas Lockhart
• 14:52   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Taral
• 14:53   Re: [HACKERS] Parser/planner and column aliases Thomas Lockhart
• 14:53   RE: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Peter Mount
• 14:55   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 14:56   Re: [HACKERS] Parser/planner and column aliases Thomas Lockhart
• 15:00   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane
• 15:30   Re: [HACKERS] Parser/planner and column aliases Tom Lane
• 15:35   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 15:46   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Mark Hollomon
• 16:02   Re: [HACKERS] SERIAL type isn't listed...? Sevo Stille
• 16:36   coming ColdFusion support for PostgreSQL Ross J. Reedstrom
• 16:41   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Oliver Elphick
• 16:47   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Patrick Welche
• 16:59   Re: [HACKERS] coming ColdFusion support for PostgreSQL Lamar Owen
• 17:27   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] coming ColdFusion support for PostgreSQL Ken J. Wright
• 19:15   Re: [HACKERS] coming ColdFusion support for PostgreSQL Ross J. Reedstrom
• 19:41   Re: [INTERFACES] coming ColdFusion support for PostgreSQL Oliver Elphick
• 20:28   how to deal with sparse/to-be populated tables Alfred Perlstein
• 20:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Hannu Krosing
• 20:46   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris Bitmead
• 20:51   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris Bitmead
• 20:52   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Hannu Krosing
• 20:53   Re: [HACKERS] SERIAL type isn't listed...? Hannu Krosing
• 20:57   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris Bitmead
• 21:07   Re: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris Bitmead
• 21:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris Bitmead
• 21:59   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris Bitmead
• 22:06   Re: [HACKERS] how to deal with sparse/to-be populated tables Chris Bitmead
• 22:12   relhasindex(was RE: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL) Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:29   Re: [HACKERS] how to deal with sparse/to-be populated tables Alfred Perlstein
• 22:29   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Ross J. Reedstrom
• 23:13   Re: [HACKERS] how to deal with sparse/to-be populated tables Chris Bitmead

4 February 2000

• 00:35   docs and createlang patch for plperl Mark Hollomon
• 01:07   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Marten Feldtmann
• 01:45   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris Bitmead
• 02:17   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane
• 02:32   Re: [HACKERS] how to deal with sparse/to-be populated tables Tom Lane
• 02:42   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Chris Bitmead
• 02:57   RE: [HACKERS] how to deal with sparse/to-be populated tables Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:09   Re: [HACKERS] how to deal with sparse/to-be populated tables Alfred Perlstein
• 03:18   Re: [HACKERS] how to deal with sparse/to-be populated tables Alfred Perlstein
• 03:19   Time travel Chris Bitmead
• 03:26   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane
• 03:43   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane
• 04:01   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Chris Bitmead
• 04:07   Re: [HACKERS] how to deal with sparse/to-be populated tables Tom Lane
• 04:34   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane
• 05:42   Re: [HACKERS] docs and createlang patch for plperl Thomas Lockhart
• 08:53   PC Week Labs benchmark results Timothy Dyck
• 09:29   Two backends at the same time Michael Meskes
• 09:57   Re: [HACKERS] Two backends at the same time Sevo Stille
• 11:51   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Mark Hollomon
• 12:17   Re: [HACKERS] how to deal with sparse/to-be populated tables Karl DeBisschop
• 12:40   Re: [HACKERS] PC Week Labs benchmark results Mike Mascari
• 12:45   Re: [HACKERS] PC Week Labs benchmark results Thomas Lockhart
• 13:18   Re: [HACKERS] Two backends at the same time Tom Lane
• 13:35   Re: [HACKERS] PC Week Labs benchmark results Tom Lane
• 13:55   Re: [HACKERS] PC Week Labs benchmark results Mike Mascari
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] PC Week Labs benchmark results Don Baccus
• 14:33   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Don Baccus
• 14:38   Re: [HACKERS] PC Week Labs benchmark results Ed Loehr
• 15:14   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Patrick Welche
• 16:24   Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Marten Feldtmann
• 17:15   Re: [HACKERS] Two backends at the same time Michael Meskes
• 17:49   Test Douglas Ribas de Mattos
• 18:01   Re: [HACKERS] Two backends at the same time Michael Meskes
• 18:59   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane
• 19:47   Identifying duplicate key inserts Assaf Arkin
• 20:08   Re: [HACKERS] Time travel Hannu Krosing
• 20:30   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Hannu Krosing
• 23:43   Re: [HACKERS] Two backends at the same time Thomas Lockhart
• 23:44   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris
• 23:52   Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris

5 February 2000

• 00:07   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Don Baccus
• 01:36   Patch attached... Chris
• 02:41   Re: [HACKERS] Patch attached... Don Baccus
• 03:02   Re: [HACKERS] Patch attached... Bruce Momjian
• 03:06   Re: [HACKERS] Patch attached... Bruce Momjian
• 03:08   Re: [HACKERS] Patch attached... Bruce Momjian
• 04:00   Re: [HACKERS] Patch attached... Chris
• 06:36   New Improved Patch Chris
• 06:46   New improved patch Chris
• 07:18   Re: [HACKERS] New improved patch^N Bruce Momjian
• 07:23   Re: [HACKERS] New improved patch^N Chris
• 07:32   Re: [HACKERS] New improved patch^N Bruce Momjian
• 08:34   TODO item Tatsuo Ishii
• 09:41   Re: [HACKERS] Patch attached... Hannu Krosing
• 09:54   Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Hannu Krosing
• 09:56   Re: [HACKERS] Patch attached... Chris
• 10:13   Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Hannu Krosing
• 10:27   Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Chris
• 10:30   Re: [HACKERS] Patch attached... Hannu Krosing
• 11:13   Re: [HACKERS] Patch attached... Chris
• 11:27   Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Hannu Krosing
• 12:38   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Patrick Welche
• 12:39   Re: [HACKERS] Patch attached... Thomas Lockhart
• 15:04   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 15:11   Status of inheritance-changing patch Tom Lane
• 15:19   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane
• 16:16   Linux MANDRAKE startup startup script is broken ? Oleg Bartunov
• 16:20   MP3Exchanger v1.13 New Internet utility. Use to exchange and locate binaries of any file format. mp3_exchanger@hotmail.com
• 17:23   Re: [HACKERS] Patch attached... Hannu Krosing
• 17:48   Re: [HACKERS] Status of inheritance-changing patch Hannu Krosing
• 18:16   FOREIGN KEY !!!!! wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:36   Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY !!!!! Don Baccus
• 18:38   Re: [HACKERS] Linux MANDRAKE startup startup script is broken ? Lamar Owen
• 18:42   Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY !!!!! wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:52   Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY !!!!! Don Baccus
• 18:56   Re: [HACKERS] Linux MANDRAKE startup startup script is broken ? (fwd) Oleg Bartunov
• 19:02   RE: [HACKERS] Linux MANDRAKE startup startup script is broken ? Dmitry Samersoff
• 19:30   Proposal for new SET variables for optimizer costs Tom Lane
• 20:03   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for new SET variables for optimizer costs Bruce Momjian
• 20:13   Spoke too soon (was RE: cvs committers digest) Lamar Owen
• 20:27   Re: [HACKERS] Spoke too soon (was RE: cvs committers digest) Tom Lane
• 20:43   Re: [HACKERS] Spoke too soon (was RE: cvs committers digest) Lamar Owen
• 20:56   Small problem with pg_ctl. Keith Parks
• 20:56   Solaris regression tests. Keith Parks
• 21:28   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for new SET variables for optimizer costs Philip Warner
• 21:32   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for new SET variables for optimizer costs Tom Lane
• 22:22   Re: Status of inheritance-changing patch Chris
• 22:47   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for new SET variables for optimizer costs Philip Warner
• 22:49   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Status of inheritance-changing patch Don Baccus
• 23:19   Re: Test clyde jones

6 February 2000

• 00:22   Optimizer cleanup to avoid redundant work on joins Tom Lane
• 01:46   pg_ctl man page Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:25   Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl man page Thomas Lockhart
• 02:43   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer cleanup to avoid redundant work on joins Bruce Momjian
• 03:05   Re: [HACKERS] Solaris regression tests. Bruce Momjian
• 04:37   Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl man page Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:38   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:01   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 06:37   RE: [HACKERS] TODO item Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:38   Re: [HACKERS] Two backends at the same time Michael Meskes
• 10:57   Advice needed, Chris
• 11:06   psql -e and -n flags Peter Eisentraut
• 11:07   libpq API tweaks Peter Eisentraut
• 12:01   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:36   Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for new SET variables for optimizercosts Sevo Stille
• 13:48   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Tom Lane
• 13:55   Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags Tom Lane
• 14:14   Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags Don Baccus
• 14:27   Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags Thomas Lockhart
• 14:43   Re: [HACKERS] Advice needed, Thomas Lockhart
• 14:47   Implicit RTEs Thomas Lockhart
• 14:50   Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags Karl DeBisschop
• 15:22   Duplicate table names Thomas Lockhart
• 15:49   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 15:58   An introduction and a plea ... Emmanuel Charpentier
• 17:53   Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags Roland Roberts
• 18:28   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer cleanup to avoid redundant work on joins Tom Lane
• 18:58   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer cleanup to avoid redundant work on joins Tom Lane
• 20:02   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer cleanup to avoid redundant work on joins Bruce Momjian
• 20:14   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer cleanup to avoid redundant work on joins Bruce Momjian
• 20:17   Need confirmation of "Posix time standard" on FreeBSD Thomas Lockhart
• 20:40   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer cleanup to avoid redundant work on joins Tom Lane
• 20:47   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer cleanup to avoid redundant work on joins Bruce Momjian
• 20:51   Case sensitivity issues Emmanuel Charpentier
• 21:02   Re: [HACKERS] An introduction and a plea ... Chris Bitmead
• 21:15   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer cleanup to avoid redundant work on joins Tom Lane
• 21:18   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer cleanup to avoid redundant work on joins Bruce Momjian
• 21:22   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer cleanup to avoid redundant work on joins Tom Lane
• 21:28   Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer cleanup to avoid redundant work on joins Bruce Momjian
• 22:00   Re: [HACKERS] Need confirmation of "Posix time standard" on FreeBSD Oliver Elphick
• 22:27   Re: [HACKERS] An introduction and a plea ... Hannu Krosing
• 22:40   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:55   Re: [HACKERS] An introduction and a plea ... Chris Bitmead
• 23:14   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Status of inheritance-changing patch Ross J. Reedstrom
• 23:19   Re: [HACKERS] An introduction and a plea ... Hannu Krosing
• 23:27   Re: [HACKERS] An introduction and a plea ... Chris Bitmead

7 February 2000

• 00:30   Re: [HACKERS] Case sensitivity issues Tom Lane
• 01:07   DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug? Don Baccus
• 02:50   Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl man page Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:01   Re: [HACKERS] Advice needed, Tom Lane
• 03:23   Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL 
• 03:25   ONLY Chris Bitmead
• 03:26   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug? Tom Lane
• 04:07   Re: [HACKERS] Advice needed, Chris Bitmead
• 04:13   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug? Taral
• 04:15   Re: [HACKERS] ONLY Don Baccus
• 04:15   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug? Don Baccus
• 04:19   Re: [HACKERS] ONLY wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 04:20   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug? Don Baccus
• 04:37   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug? Tom Lane
• 04:48   follow-up on PC Week Labs benchmark results Timothy Dyck
• 04:50   Re: [HACKERS] Case sensitivity issues Michael Meskes
• 06:32   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug? Chris
• 06:43   Re: [HACKERS] ONLY Chris
• 07:57   RE: [HACKERS] ONLY Ansley, Michael
• 10:13   New Globe Vince Vielhaber
• 10:25   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:25   Re: [HACKERS] Need confirmation of "Posix time standard" on FreeBSD Malcolm Beattie
• 10:31   RE: [HACKERS] New Globe Peter Mount
• 10:32   RE: [HACKERS] New Globe Vince Vielhaber
• 12:19   Can you dereference an OID? Martijn van Oosterhout
• 12:25   Longer Column Names Jeff MacDonald
• 12:46   Re: [HACKERS] follow-up on PC Week Labs benchmark results Thomas Lockhart
• 12:52   Re: [HACKERS] Need confirmation of "Posix time standard" on FreeBSD Thomas Lockhart
• 13:13   Re: [HACKERS] Need confirmation of "Posix time standard" on FreeBSD Malcolm Beattie
• 13:21   Re: [HACKERS] ONLY Don Baccus
• 13:21   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Don Baccus
• 13:21   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug? Don Baccus
• 13:33   Re: [HACKERS] follow-up on PC Week Labs benchmark results Don Baccus
• 13:57   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug? Tom Lane
• 13:59   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:04   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug? Tom Lane
• 14:07   Re: [HACKERS] Longer Column Names Tom Lane
• 14:08   Re: [HACKERS] Need confirmation of "Posix time standard" on FreeBSD Gene Sokolov
• 14:13   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Bruce Momjian
• 14:16   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Vince Vielhaber
• 14:27   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug? Don Baccus
• 14:35   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Bruce Momjian
• 14:36   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 14:40   Inprise/Corel merger Bruce Momjian
• 14:41   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Tom Lane
• 14:49   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Tom Lane
• 14:59   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Lamar Owen
• 14:59   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Don Baccus
• 15:07   status Thomas Lockhart
• 15:12   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug? Tom Lane
• 15:13   PostgreSQL 7 RPMs coming soon Lamar Owen
• 15:23   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:37   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Bruce Momjian
• 15:39   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 16:14   fsync alternatives (was: Re: [HACKERS] TODO item) Alfred Perlstein
• 16:23   Re: [HACKERS] Longer Column Names Jeff MacDonald
• 16:32   Re: fsync alternatives (was: Re: [HACKERS] TODO item) Bruce Momjian
• 16:47   RI project status wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:54   Re: fsync alternatives (was: Re: [HACKERS] TODO item) Alfred Perlstein
• 16:54   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT and ORDER BY bug? Don Baccus
• 16:55   Re: [HACKERS] ONLY Taral
• 16:58   Re: fsync alternatives (was: Re: [HACKERS] TODO item) Bruce Momjian
• 17:14   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 7 RPMs coming soon Oleg Bartunov
• 17:28   Re: [HACKERS] ONLY Don Baccus
• 17:48   Re: [HACKERS] Duplicate table names Peter Eisentraut
• 17:49   Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags Peter Eisentraut
• 17:49   Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags Peter Eisentraut
• 17:49   Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags Peter Eisentraut
• 17:53   Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl man page Peter Eisentraut
• 17:57   Using libpq.dll from Delphi wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:34   network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question Oleg Bartunov
• 18:34   Re: [HACKERS] Duplicate table names Don Baccus
• 18:47   Re: [HACKERS] An introduction and a plea ... Hannu Krosing
• 18:53   Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question Bruce Momjian
• 19:05   Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question Bruce Momjian
• 19:12   CFH: Mariposa, distributed DB Ross J. Reedstrom
• 19:15   Re: [HACKERS] Duplicate table names Don Baccus
• 19:15   Re: [HACKERS] follow-up on PC Week Labs benchmark results Hannu Krosing
• 19:24   Re: [HACKERS] CFH: Mariposa, distributed DB Bruce Momjian
• 19:37   Re: [HACKERS] CFH: Mariposa, distributed DB Hannu Krosing
• 19:51   Re: [HACKERS] CFH: Mariposa, distributed DB Ross J. Reedstrom
• 19:56   Re: ipmeter-user: Ipmeter + MySql ?? (fwd) The Hermit Hacker
• 19:57   Re: [HACKERS] CFH: Mariposa, distributed DB Ross J. Reedstrom
• 19:58   Re: [HACKERS] CFH: Mariposa, distributed DB Hannu Krosing
• 20:09   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ipmeter-user: Ipmeter + MySql ?? (fwd) Bruce Momjian
• 20:24   Re: [HACKERS] CFH: Mariposa, distributed DB Don Baccus
• 20:58   Re: [HACKERS] CFH: Mariposa, distributed DB Ross J. Reedstrom
• 21:08   psql and libpq fixes Peter Eisentraut
• 21:08   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 7 RPMs coming soon Peter Eisentraut
• 21:12   Re: [HACKERS] Longer Column Names Peter Eisentraut
• 21:16   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 7 RPMs coming soon Lamar Owen
• 21:18   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Chris Bitmead
• 21:18   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Tom Lane
• 21:21   Re: [HACKERS] ONLY Chris Bitmead
• 21:25   Re: [HACKERS] CFH: Mariposa, distributed DB Don Baccus
• 21:26   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Vince Vielhaber
• 21:32   Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question Tom Lane
• 21:33   RE: [HACKERS] TODO item Hiroshi Inoue
• 21:35   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Tom Lane
• 21:37   Re: fsync alternatives (was: Re: [HACKERS] TODO item) Chris Bitmead
• 21:37   Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question Tom Lane
• 22:00   Re: [HACKERS] ONLY Chris Bitmead
• 22:02   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Bruce Momjian
• 22:03   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Bruce Momjian
• 22:05   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 22:07   Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question Bruce Momjian
• 22:08   Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question Bruce Momjian
• 22:08   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 22:08   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 22:47   Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes Tom Lane
• 23:00   RE: [HACKERS] TODO item Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:10   RE: [HACKERS] TODO item Don Baccus
• 23:52   Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl man page Tatsuo Ishii

8 February 2000

• 01:01   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 01:01   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Tom Lane
• 01:03   Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL Marten Feldtmann
• 01:23   RE: [HACKERS] TODO item Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:27   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Tom Lane
• 01:30   ExecInitAppend Chris Bitmead
• 01:51   UPDATE on subclass Chris Bitmead
• 02:16   Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE on subclass Chris Bitmead
• 02:28   Re: [HACKERS] ExecInitAppend Tom Lane
• 02:28   Is this it? Chris Bitmead
• 02:51   Re: [HACKERS] ExecInitAppend Chris Bitmead
• 02:55   Re: [HACKERS] Is this it? Chris Bitmead
• 03:07   Regression tests... Chris Bitmead
• 03:16   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Don Baccus
• 03:16   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Don Baccus
• 03:59   Bug in cursors?? Chris Bitmead
• 04:07   Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests... Tom Lane
• 04:10   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Chris Bitmead
• 04:18   Re: [HACKERS] Is this it? Tom Lane
• 04:25   Questions on 7.0 for RPM building Lamar Owen
• 04:34   Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests... Thomas Lockhart
• 04:40   Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl man page Thomas Lockhart
• 04:46   Re: [HACKERS] Duplicate table names Thomas Lockhart
• 04:48   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Tom Lane
• 04:56   Re: [HACKERS] Questions on 7.0 for RPM building Thomas Lockhart
• 04:59   Re: [HACKERS] Questions on 7.0 for RPM building Bruce Momjian
• 05:02   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 05:04   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Bruce Momjian
• 05:07   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Thomas Lockhart
• 05:44   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Tom Lane
• 06:26   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Tom Lane
• 06:31   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Bruce Momjian
• 06:39   RE: [HACKERS] Bug in cursors?? Hiroshi Inoue
• 06:59   Inserting large objects Peter Mount
• 07:11   How to make a patch? Chris
• 07:31   Re: [HACKERS] Bug in cursors?? Bruce Momjian
• 07:34   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 08:08   RE: [HACKERS] Bug in cursors?? Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:55   Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question Oleg Bartunov
• 09:10   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Vince Vielhaber
• 09:11   Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests... wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 09:33   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Hannu Krosing
• 09:33   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 7 RPMs coming soon Peter Eisentraut
• 09:35   Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes Peter Eisentraut
• 09:51   Re: [HACKERS] How to make a patch? Peter Eisentraut
• 10:10   New Patch Chris
• 10:12   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:47   Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl man page Lamar Owen
• 10:56   Re: [HACKERS] Questions on 7.0 for RPM building Lamar Owen
• 10:57   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Peter Eisentraut
• 11:00   Re: [HACKERS] Questions on 7.0 for RPM building Lamar Owen
• 11:38   Re: [HACKERS] How to make a patch? Lamar Owen
• 12:31   Re: [HACKERS] Bug in cursors?? Bruce Momjian
• 12:31   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Bruce Momjian
• 13:16   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe The Hermit Hacker
• 13:45   Re: [HACKERS] CFH: Mariposa, distributed DB Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 13:50   Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes Tom Lane
• 13:53   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Tom Lane
• 13:56   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Bruce Momjian
• 13:57   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Vince Vielhaber
• 14:03   Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes Bruce Momjian
• 14:05   Deferred trigger queue wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:15   Ordering of pg_dump output Tom Lane
• 14:16   Re: [HACKERS] docs and createlang patch for plperl Tom Lane
• 14:23   Re: [HACKERS] New Globe Vince Vielhaber
• 14:30   Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes Tom Lane
• 14:41   Re: [HACKERS] Ordering of pg_dump output Bruce Momjian
• 14:42   Re: [HACKERS] Deferred trigger queue Tom Lane
• 14:50   AW: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:54   Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes Bruce Momjian
• 15:29   COPY from file Ole Gjerde
• 15:48   Re: [HACKERS] Deferred trigger queue Thomas Lockhart
• 16:01   RE: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes Dmitry Samersoff
• 16:10   Re: [HACKERS] Deferred trigger queue Thomas Lockhart
• 16:17   Re: [HACKERS] Need confirmation of "Posix time standard" on FreeBSD Thomas Lockhart
• 16:58   Re: [HACKERS] docs and createlang patch for plperl Mark Hollomon
• 17:00   Re: [HACKERS] Ordering of pg_dump output Mark Hollomon
• 17:30   Re: [HACKERS] Ordering of pg_dump output Don Baccus
• 17:35   Re: [HACKERS] Ordering of pg_dump output wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:44   Re: [HACKERS] Deferred trigger queue wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:46   Re: [HACKERS] docs and createlang patch for plperl wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:56   Re: [HACKERS] Deferred trigger queue wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:45   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Chris Bitmead
• 20:53   Re: [HACKERS] Ordering of pg_dump output Chris Bitmead
• 22:08   Re: [HACKERS] Ordering of pg_dump output Peter Eisentraut
• 22:11   Re: [HACKERS] COPY from file Peter Eisentraut
• 22:12   Re: [HACKERS] COPY from file Tom Lane
• 22:21   Re: [HACKERS] Ordering of pg_dump output Tom Lane
• 22:22   Re: [HACKERS] COPY from file Peter Eisentraut
• 23:00   POR FIN DINERO REAL SIN TRAMPAS Javi Piñol

9 February 2000

• 00:09   Regression tests Chris Bitmead
• 00:34   minor bug... Don Baccus
• 00:37   VxWorks ports? Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:50   plperl droplang patch Mark Hollomon
• 00:55   Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests Thomas Lockhart
• 03:25   Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests Tom Lane
• 04:20   RE: [HACKERS] Bug in cursors?? Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:53   backend startup Chris Bitmead
• 05:52   Re: [HACKERS] backend startup Tom Lane
• 06:18   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:13   Re: [HACKERS] backend startup Chris
• 07:38   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Alfred Perlstein
• 08:02   Re: [HACKERS] WinNT compiling: ongoing Kevin Lo
• 08:28   Re: [HACKERS] WinNT compiling: ongoing References:  Kevin Lo
• 08:31   Small update for WinNT port Horák Daniel
• 11:36   AW: AW: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 12:30   Re: Postgresql Perl Problem Vince Daniels
• 13:05   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Tatsuo Ishii
• 13:08   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Tom Lane
• 13:51   AW: [HACKERS] TODO item Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:06   Re: [HACKERS] minor bug... Tom Lane
• 14:13   Re: [HACKERS] backend startup Don Baccus
• 14:20   Re: Small update for WinNT port Bruce Momjian
• 14:23   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 17:11   jdbc and sequences --RM FixerRM@aol.com
• 18:11   Re: [HACKERS] Bug in cursors?? Bruce Momjian
• 18:16   Re: [HACKERS] plperl droplang patch Bruce Momjian
• 20:36   Re: [HACKERS] backend startup Chris Bitmead
• 20:55   Re: [HACKERS] backend startup Don Baccus
• 21:18   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Alfred Perlstein
• 21:28   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Tom Lane
• 21:29   Re: [HACKERS] TODO item Bruce Momjian
• 22:02   how to make libpq on winnt using the 'win32.mak's Rini Dutta
• 22:09   how to make libpq on winnt using the 'win32.mak's Rini Dutta
• 22:28   RE: [HACKERS] TODO item Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:47   Re: [HACKERS] backend startup Chris Bitmead
• 23:13   Re: [HACKERS] Need confirmation of "Posix time standard" on FreeBSD Peter Eisentraut
• 23:14   Re: [HACKERS] Small update for WinNT port Peter Eisentraut

10 February 2000

• 00:53   backendid and backendtag Chris Bitmead
• 02:39   Re: [HACKERS] minor bug... Thomas Lockhart
• 04:44   Re: [HACKERS] Need confirmation of "Posix time standard" on FreeBSD Thomas Lockhart
• 08:04   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Hannu Krosing
• 08:46   jdbc 1.2 and postgrsSQL-6.5.3 on RedHat 6.1 Richa Singh
• 08:50   Jdbc and Postfresql-6.5.3 on RedHat 6.1 Richa Singh
• 09:33   Re: [HACKERS] minor bug... Hannu Krosing
• 10:24   libpq Chris
• 10:40   AW: AW: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 11:40   how to make libpq on winnt using the 'win32.mak's Rini Dutta
• 11:49   how to make libpq on winnt using the 'win32.mak's Rini Dutta
• 12:17   how to make libpq on winnt using the 'win32.mak's Rini Dutta
• 12:35   Re: [HACKERS] how to make libpq on winnt using the 'win32.mak's wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:25   Re: [HACKERS] libpq Tom Lane
• 13:26   RE: [HACKERS] how to make libpq on winnt using the 'win32.mak's Magnus Hagander
• 13:26   Re: [HACKERS] how to make libpq on winnt using the 'win32.mak's Rini Dutta
• 13:32   RE: [HACKERS] how to make libpq on winnt using the 'win32.mak's Magnus Hagander
• 13:34   createdb default arguments Thomas Lockhart
• 13:46   Re: [HACKERS] how to make libpq on winnt using the 'win32.mak's Bruce Momjian
• 13:48   RE: [HACKERS] Small update for WinNT port Horák Daniel
• 14:03   Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes Brian E Gallew
• 14:07   Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes Bruce Momjian
• 14:08   Re: [HACKERS] createdb default arguments Peter Eisentraut
• 14:13   Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes Peter Eisentraut
• 14:17   Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes Bruce Momjian
• 14:18   Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes Peter Eisentraut
• 14:20   Re: [HACKERS] createdb default arguments Bruce Momjian
• 14:22   Re: [HACKERS] createdb default arguments Thomas Lockhart
• 14:27   Re: [HACKERS] createdb default arguments Peter Eisentraut
• 14:48   Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Tom Lane
• 14:53   Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes Thomas Lockhart
• 14:56   Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes Bruce Momjian
• 15:13   RE: [HACKERS] how to make libpq on winnt using the 'win32.mak's Rini Dutta
• 15:26   Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes Peter Eisentraut
• 15:52   Re: [HACKERS] createdb default arguments Lamar Owen
• 15:56   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Ross J. Reedstrom
• 16:22   make_ctags script Ross J. Reedstrom
• 16:26   Re: [HACKERS] minor bug... Don Baccus
• 16:35   Re: [HACKERS] make_ctags script Bruce Momjian
• 18:04   Re: [HACKERS] createdb default arguments Peter Eisentraut
• 18:12   psql options Peter Eisentraut
• 18:14   Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes Peter Eisentraut
• 19:03   Re: [HACKERS] make_ctags script Ross J. Reedstrom
• 19:38   Re: [HACKERS] minor bug... Thomas Lockhart
• 19:43   Re: [HACKERS] createdb default arguments Thomas Lockhart
• 20:08   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ECPG documentation Thomas Lockhart
• 21:05   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Chris Bitmead
• 21:18   Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Chris Bitmead
• 21:26   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 22:01   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Chris Bitmead

11 February 2000

• 01:16   RE: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:52   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Tom Lane
• 03:09   Re: [HACKERS] libpq Chris Bitmead
• 03:29   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Tom Lane
• 03:59   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Philip Warner
• 04:03   Almost there on column aliases Thomas Lockhart
• 04:13   Re: [HACKERS] libpq Tom Lane
• 04:18   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Tom Lane
• 04:18   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Chris Bitmead
• 04:44   Re: [HACKERS] libpq Chris Bitmead
• 04:47   Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes Michael Meskes
• 04:47   Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes Michael Meskes
• 07:11   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Tom Lane
• 07:12   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 07:12   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Tom Lane
• 07:16   RE: [HACKERS] how to make libpq on winnt using the 'win32.mak's Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:08   Visit www.ventura.vu ventura
• 08:35   Re: [INTERFACES] The persistance of C functions Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 10:14   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] The persistance of C functions Mike Mascari
• 12:39   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Thomas Lockhart
• 13:00   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Tom Lane
• 13:07   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Tom Lane
• 13:10   Re: [HACKERS] libpq Tom Lane
• 13:15   Re: [HACKERS] how to make libpq on winnt using the 'win32.mak's Hannu Krosing
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Ross J. Reedstrom
• 13:45   cvsupd OK? Thomas Lockhart
• 15:23   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Hannu Krosing
• 15:54   Re: [HACKERS] cvsupd OK? Bruce Momjian
• 16:58   Re: [HACKERS] cvsupd OK? Alfred Perlstein
• 19:06   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Patrick Welche
• 19:46   Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Hannu Krosing
• 21:19   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane

12 February 2000

• 09:14   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ECPG documentation Michael Meskes

13 February 2000

• 03:46   Problems compiling latest CVS sources. Billy G. Allie
• 10:04   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Chris Bitmead
• 10:07   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Chris
• 10:30   Re: [HACKERS] libpq Chris
• 10:34   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Chris
• 11:21   Re: [HACKERS] Problems compiling latest CVS sources. Bruce Momjian
• 13:04   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 14:17   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Hannu Krosing
• 14:54   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Tom Lane
• 15:13   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Tom Lane
• 15:44   Re: [HACKERS] libpq Tom Lane
• 17:25   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 17:25   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 17:26   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 19:42   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Peter Eisentraut
• 21:16   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Chris Bitmead
• 21:20   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Chris Bitmead
• 21:32   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 21:44   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Tom Lane
• 22:09   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 22:28   Re: [HACKERS] libpq Chris Bitmead

14 February 2000

• 00:49   Suggestion to split /data/base directory Chairudin Sentosa
• 02:22   pgsql-support 'distribution' ... The Hermit Hacker
• 02:25   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Tom Lane
• 02:36   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Chris Bitmead
• 02:53   Re: [HACKERS] Suggestion to split /data/base directory Don Baccus
• 03:06   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 03:07   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 03:32   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Chris Bitmead
• 03:41   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Philip Warner
• 03:51   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Chris Bitmead
• 04:34   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Tom Lane
• 07:19   subscribe hackers davida
• 07:34   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Hannu Krosing
• 08:00   function defined in libpq? Michael Meskes
• 09:25   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Patrick Welche
• 09:48   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Chris
• 10:12   Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Chris
• 10:33   Re: Postgres ODBC Bruce Momjian
• 11:17   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Philip Warner
• 12:04   patch for binding tuples from result set to user allocated memory Joel Reed
• 12:51   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Karl DeBisschop
• 13:45   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 13:45   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 13:45   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 13:45   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 13:55   Limit and Order by stuff sszabo@bigpanda.com
• 14:00   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane
• 14:14   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Patrick Welche
• 14:50   Programmers needed to implement Replication ... The Hermit Hacker
• 15:12   Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Thomas Lockhart
• 15:30   Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Bruce Momjian
• 17:28   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Tom Lane
• 17:40   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 19:19   Release on the 15th? Lamar Owen
• 20:47   Re: [HACKERS] Release on the 15th? Tom Lane
• 21:34   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Chris Bitmead
• 22:35   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Hannu Krosing
• 22:45   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Hannu Krosing
• 22:55   RE: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:57   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 23:10   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 23:10   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 23:11   pid_t define missing in include/miscadmin.h ... The Hermit Hacker
• 23:20   Re: [HACKERS] Release on the 15th? The Hermit Hacker

15 February 2000

• 00:09   Re: [HACKERS] pid_t define missing in include/miscadmin.h ... Bruce Momjian
• 00:11   subscribe aubrey
• 00:27   Re: [HACKERS] pid_t define missing in include/miscadmin.h ... Alfred Perlstein
• 00:27   Re: [HACKERS] pid_t define missing in include/miscadmin.h ... The Hermit Hacker
• 00:37   Re: [HACKERS] Release on the 15th? Thomas Lockhart
• 00:45   Re: schema: pg_dump -s ipmeter (fwd) The Hermit Hacker
• 00:46   Re: [HACKERS] pid_t define missing in include/miscadmin.h ... The Hermit Hacker
• 01:17   Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Thomas Lockhart
• 01:29   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Chris Bitmead
• 01:51   Great timing (not) Thomas Lockhart
• 02:08   tuple is too big Howard Williams
• 03:24   README.qnx4 -> FAQ_QNX4 Thomas Lockhart
• 03:28   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Don Baccus
• 03:55   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Chris Bitmead
• 04:05   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Bruce Momjian
• 04:11   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Chris Bitmead
• 04:31   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Tom Lane
• 04:33   Re: [HACKERS] Release on the 15th? Tom Lane
• 06:01   RE: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Hiroshi Inoue
• 06:07   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Philip Warner
• 06:33   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Tom Lane
• 07:04   Re: [HACKERS] README.qnx4 -> FAQ_QNX4 Kardos, Dr. Andreas
• 09:05   ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 1381319466 Oleg Bartunov
• 10:12   Re: [HACKERS] pgsql-support 'distribution' ... Peter Eisentraut
• 10:14   Re: [HACKERS] function defined in libpq? Peter Eisentraut
• 10:16   parser changes Michael Meskes
• 10:16   function question yet again Michael Meskes
• 10:25   Re: [HACKERS] Re: schema: pg_dump -s ipmeter (fwd) Peter Eisentraut
• 10:59   Re: [HACKERS] Re: schema: pg_dump -s ipmeter (fwd) Sevo Stille
• 11:40   Re: [HACKERS] function defined in libpq? Mike Mascari
• 11:45   Re: [HACKERS] function defined in libpq? Peter Eisentraut
• 11:45   Re: [HACKERS] function question yet again Mike Mascari
• 11:49   Re: [HACKERS] function defined in libpq? Mike Mascari
• 12:05   Re: [HACKERS] function defined in libpq? Michael Meskes
• 12:16   Re: [HACKERS] function question yet again Sevo Stille
• 12:52   Most Advanced Jeff MacDonald
• 13:51   Re: [HACKERS] Most Advanced Lamar Owen
• 13:53   Re: [HACKERS] Most Advanced Bruce Momjian
• 13:59   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 1381319466 Tom Lane
• 14:00   Re: [HACKERS] Release on the 15th? Lamar Owen
• 14:03   Re: [HACKERS] Most Advanced Bruce Momjian
• 14:49   Re: [HACKERS] Most Advanced Lamar Owen
• 15:24   Re: [HACKERS] Re: schema: pg_dump -s ipmeter (fwd) The Hermit Hacker
• 15:25   Germany Andreas
• 15:28   Re: [HACKERS] Release on the 15th? The Hermit Hacker
• 15:37   Re: [HACKERS] Most Advanced Peter Eisentraut
• 15:39   Re: [HACKERS] Re: schema: pg_dump -s ipmeter (fwd) Peter Eisentraut
• 15:57   Re: [HACKERS] Most Advanced Hannu Krosing
• 16:05   Re: [HACKERS] Re: schema: pg_dump -s ipmeter (fwd) The Hermit Hacker
• 16:14   RE: [HACKERS] Release on the 15th? Peter Mount
• 17:02   Re: [HACKERS] function question yet again Michael Meskes
• 17:02   Re: [HACKERS] function question yet again Michael Meskes
• 17:03   Re: [HACKERS] function defined in libpq? Michael Meskes
• 17:24   Re: [HACKERS] function question yet again Michael Meskes
• 18:13   Re: [HACKERS] function question yet again Mike Mascari
• 18:25   Re: [HACKERS] Most Advanced Bruce Momjian
• 19:04   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Tom Lane
• 19:10   Interbase Bruce Momjian
• 19:13   Re: [HACKERS] Most Advanced The Hermit Hacker
• 19:24   Re: [HACKERS] Most Advanced Bruce Momjian
• 19:30   Re: [HACKERS] function question yet again Tom Lane
• 19:39   Re: [HACKERS] Interbase Lamar Owen
• 19:42   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Thomas Lockhart
• 19:56   Re: [HACKERS] Most Advanced Alfred Perlstein
• 19:57   Re: [HACKERS] Most Advanced Hannu Krosing
• 20:01   Re: [HACKERS] Interbase Bruce Momjian
• 20:14   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Tom Lane
• 20:52   Re: [HACKERS] Most Advanced Ross J. Reedstrom
• 20:56   Re: [HACKERS] Most Advanced The Hermit Hacker
• 21:17   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Thomas Lockhart
• 21:59   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Tom Lane
• 22:02   Re: [HACKERS] Most Advanced Bruce Momjian
• 22:40   IBM sues Informix over DB patents Ross J. Reedstrom
• 22:50   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Thomas Lockhart

16 February 2000

• 01:02   Re: [HACKERS] Release on the 15th? Thomas Lockhart
• 01:05   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: copyObject: don't know how to copy 1381319466 Thomas Lockhart
• 02:03   vnunet.com Inprise/Borland spins off Interbase database as separate company Ed Loehr
• 02:33   Re: [HACKERS] parser changes Thomas Lockhart
• 04:02   Re: [HACKERS] parser changes Bruce Momjian
• 04:03   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Thomas Lockhart
• 04:27   Re: [HACKERS] parser changes Tom Lane
• 04:37   Re: [HACKERS] IBM sues Informix over DB patents Hannu Krosing
• 05:16   Re: [HACKERS] function question yet again Michael Meskes
• 05:16   Re: [HACKERS] parser changes Michael Meskes
• 06:59   Re: [HACKERS] Interbase Chris
• 07:03   Postgres meets InterBase (ZDNet) Oleg Broytmann
• 07:15   Re: [HACKERS] Interbase Bruce Momjian
• 07:21   Re: [HACKERS] vnunet.com Inprise/Borland spins off Interbase database as separate company Chris
• 08:42   postgres on notebook Oleg Bartunov
• 09:52   ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' Michael Meskes
• 09:52   psql compile problems Michael Meskes
• 10:14   TODO: Cache most recent query plan Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 11:10   Re: [HACKERS] psql compile problems Bruce Momjian
• 11:33   Re: [HACKERS] TODO: Cache most recent query plan Chris
• 12:07   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' Thomas Lockhart
• 12:08   Re: [HACKERS] postgres on notebook Thomas Lockhart
• 12:30   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' Tom Lane
• 12:40   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' Thomas Lockhart
• 12:46   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' Tom Lane
• 13:07   Re: [HACKERS] parser changes Tom Lane
• 13:20   Re: [HACKERS] TODO: Cache most recent query plan Tom Lane
• 13:44   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Tom Lane
• 13:44   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Thomas Lockhart
• 13:57   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres meets InterBase (ZDNet) Lamar Owen
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' Gene Sokolov
• 14:14   Re: [HACKERS] psql compile problems Peter Eisentraut
• 14:17   DESCRIPTORS Michael Meskes
• 14:37   Re: [HACKERS] parser changes Bruce Momjian
• 14:42   Re: [HACKERS] psql compile problems Bruce Momjian
• 14:56   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres meets InterBase (ZDNet) Bruce Momjian
• 15:34   Date/time types: big change Thomas Lockhart
• 16:38   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change Peter Eisentraut
• 16:56   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Bruce Momjian
• 17:29   Re: [HACKERS] parser changes Michael Meskes
• 18:31   re: SQL compliance, was Re: [HACKERS] follow-up on PC Week Labs benchmark results Timothy Dyck
• 19:26   PC Week PostgreSQL benchmark results posted online Timothy Dyck
• 20:05   FYI: BNF for SQL93 and SQL-3 Hannu Krosing
• 20:09   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Tom Lane
• 20:15   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Bruce Momjian
• 20:31   Re: [HACKERS] FYI: BNF for SQL93 and SQL-3 Bruce Momjian
• 20:47   Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Philip Warner
• 20:59   pgaccess and multibyte-enabled libpq Oliver Elphick
• 21:16   FYI: OO features of Oracle 8 and Informix Hannu Krosing
• 21:18   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Oliver Elphick
• 21:26   Maximum columns for optimum performance (fwd) Peter Eisentraut
• 21:38   psql password prompt Bruce Momjian
• 21:46   RE: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:36   create database doesn't work well in MULTIBYTE mode Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:39   Re: [HACKERS] Maximum columns for optimum performance (fwd) Tom Lane

17 February 2000

• 00:32   RE: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:38   Re: [HACKERS] FYI: BNF for SQL93 and SQL-3 Chris Bitmead
• 00:42   psql problem Chris Bitmead
• 01:12   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 01:24   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' Tom Lane
• 01:31   Re: [HACKERS] psql problem Tom Lane
• 01:35   Re: [HACKERS] psql problem] Bruce Momjian
• 01:37   Re: [HACKERS] psql problem Bruce Momjian
• 02:03   Re: [HACKERS] psql problem Tom Lane
• 02:48   Re: [HACKERS] psql problem Chris Bitmead
• 03:41   Re: [HACKERS] create database doesn't work well in MULTIBYTE mode Bruce Momjian
• 03:54   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change Thomas Lockhart
• 03:59   RE: [HACKERS] create database doesn't work well in MULTIBYTE mode Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:07   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Thomas Lockhart
• 04:12   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Tom Lane
• 04:22   Re: SQL compliance, was Re: [HACKERS] follow-up on PC Week Labsbenchmark results Thomas Lockhart
• 04:30   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change Tom Lane
• 04:31   Re: [HACKERS] libpq Chris Bitmead
• 05:02   Re: [HACKERS] libpq Tom Lane
• 05:04   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' Thomas Lockhart
• 05:25   Definitional issue for INET types Tom Lane
• 05:28   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Tom Lane
• 05:39   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' Tom Lane
• 07:22   Re: [HACKERS] FYI: BNF for SQL93 and SQL-3 Hannu Krosing
• 08:57   Re: [HACKERS] psql problem Vince Vielhaber
• 09:17   Re: [HACKERS] psql problem Peter Eisentraut
• 09:21   Re: [HACKERS] psql problem Peter Eisentraut
• 09:25   Re: [HACKERS] psql password prompt Peter Eisentraut
• 09:32   Re: [HACKERS] function question yet again Christof Petig
• 09:49   Re: [HACKERS] create database doesn't work well in MULTIBYTE mode Peter Eisentraut
• 10:00   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change Peter Eisentraut
• 10:10   Re: [HACKERS] Definitional issue for INET types Sevo Stille
• 10:11   Re: [HACKERS] Definitional issue for INET types Peter Eisentraut
• 12:10   PC Week PostgreSQL benchmark results posted online (fwd) Jeff MacDonald
• 12:33   Re: [HACKERS] create database doesn't work well in MULTIBYTE mode Thomas Lockhart
• 12:44   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' Thomas Lockhart
• 12:49   Re: [HACKERS] PC Week PostgreSQL benchmark results posted online (fwd) Thomas Lockhart
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] create database doesn't work well in MULTIBYTE mode Thomas Lockhart
• 13:10   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Thomas Lockhart
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] Definitional issue for INET types Tom Lane
• 13:49   Re: [HACKERS] Definitional issue for INET types Tom Lane
• 13:58   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Tom Lane
• 14:08   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change Tom Lane
• 14:12   Re: [HACKERS] Definitional issue for INET types Sevo Stille
• 14:24   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Tom Lane
• 14:38   Re: [HACKERS] Definitional issue for INET types Tom Lane
• 15:00   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Bruce Momjian
• 15:04   psql and Control-C Peter Eisentraut
• 16:44   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Michael Meskes
• 16:44   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Michael Meskes
• 17:12   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Thomas Lockhart
• 17:46   Re: [HACKERS] function question yet again Michael Meskes
• 18:25   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Bruce Momjian
• 20:20   Re: [HACKERS] PC Week PostgreSQL benchmark results posted online (fwd) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:27   Re: [HACKERS] libpq Chris Bitmead
• 21:37   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Chris Bitmead
• 21:40   password change / table creation Herr Dumont
• 21:41   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Tom Lane
• 21:42   Re: [HACKERS] FYI: BNF for SQL93 and SQL-3 Chris Bitmead
• 22:05   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Chris Bitmead
• 22:05   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Alfred Perlstein
• 22:12   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Bruce Momjian
• 22:19   Re: [HACKERS] create database doesn't work well in MULTIBYTE mode Peter Eisentraut
• 22:23   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Peter Eisentraut
• 23:23   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Chris Bitmead
• 23:24   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Chris Bitmead
• 23:27   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Chris Bitmead
• 23:54   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Alfred Perlstein

18 February 2000

• 02:28   queries on 2+ indices Marc Tardif
• 02:39   Re: [HACKERS] create database doesn't work well in MULTIBYTE mode Thomas Lockhart
• 02:40   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Thomas Lockhart
• 02:40   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Thomas Lockhart
• 02:55   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Bruce Momjian
• 02:55   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Bruce Momjian
• 03:06   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Thomas Lockhart
• 03:13   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Tom Lane
• 03:13   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Chris Bitmead
• 04:00   Re: [HACKERS] queries on 2+ indices Tom Lane
• 04:09   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Chris Bitmead
• 06:21   Large object problem in 6.5.2 & 3 root
• 08:28   Re: [HACKERS] TODO: Cache most recent query plan Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 09:27   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 10:26    Mauricio da Silva Barrios
• 11:52   Re: [HACKERS] PC Week PostgreSQL benchmark results posted online (fwd) Jose Soares
• 12:17   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Peter Eisentraut
• 12:20   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Peter Eisentraut
• 12:21   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Peter Eisentraut
• 12:22   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Peter Eisentraut
• 12:24   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Peter Eisentraut
• 12:30   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Peter Eisentraut
• 12:39   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change Thomas Lockhart
• 12:48   Re: [HACKERS] create database doesn't work well in MULTIBYTE mode Peter Eisentraut
• 13:25   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Tom Lane
• 13:36   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Tom Lane
• 13:39   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Thomas Lockhart
• 13:53   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Tom Lane
• 14:08   Is it a bug? Mauricio da Silva Barrios
• 14:09   Is it a bug? Mauricio da Silva Barrios
• 14:10   Is it a bug? Mauricio da Silva Barrios
• 14:19   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Thomas Lockhart
• 14:42   Re: [HACKERS] queries on 2+ indices Marc Tardif
• 21:32   Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ? Hannu Krosing
• 22:02   Re: [HACKERS] queries on 2+ indices Tom Lane
• 22:16   Re: Is it a bug? Tom Lane
• 22:23   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ? Tom Lane
• 22:45   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ? Bruce Momjian
• 23:25   Generalized Top Queries on PostgreSQL Roberto Cornacchia
• 23:29   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ? Hannu Krosing
• 23:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ? Bruce Momjian
• 23:59   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ? Thomas Lockhart

19 February 2000

• 00:07   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ? Bruce Momjian
• 00:18   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level? Thomas Lockhart
• 00:38   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ? Tom Lane
• 03:09   new backslah command of psql Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:27   handling multiple file descriptors Marc Tardif
• 05:30   Re: [HACKERS] handling multiple file descriptors Tom Lane
• 06:24   gram.y foreign keys Thomas Lockhart
• 07:08   Re: [HACKERS] gram.y foreign keys Bruce Momjian
• 10:02   Re: UESQLC Bruce Momjian
• 12:11   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Peter Eisentraut
• 12:11   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Peter Eisentraut
• 12:11   Re: SQL compliance Peter Eisentraut
• 12:11   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' Peter Eisentraut
• 14:53   Re: [HACKERS] gram.y foreign keys Tom Lane
• 14:56   Re: [HACKERS] Re: UESQLC Tom Lane
• 15:02   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Tom Lane
• 15:16   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance Tom Lane
• 17:22   Nasty portability glitch in plperl Tom Lane
• 20:26   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change Tom Lane

20 February 2000

• 00:33   Re: [HACKERS] new backslah command of psql Peter Eisentraut
• 00:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance Peter Eisentraut
• 02:11   Re: [HACKERS] new backslah command of psql Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:01   Re: [HACKERS] new backslah command of psql Bruce Momjian
• 06:25   Re: [HACKERS] new backslash command of psql Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:03   Re: [HACKERS] Re: UESQLC Michael Meskes
• 12:20   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance Peter Eisentraut
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level? Hannu Krosing
• 13:44   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level? Hannu Krosing
• 14:35   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance Tom Lane
• 15:42   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level? Tom Lane
• 21:14   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Chris Bitmead
• 23:04   Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Tom Lane

21 February 2000

• 01:44   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Chris Bitmead
• 05:00   Numeric with '-' Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:55   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-' Brian Hirt
• 06:47   RE: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-' Hiroshi Inoue
• 07:01   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-' Tom Lane
• 07:09   Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Jeroen van Vianen
• 07:56   Re: [HACKERS] Re: UESQLC Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 11:45   Beta for 4:30AST ... ? The Hermit Hacker
• 12:50    j.j.geel
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Tom Lane
• 13:44   ShmemCreate: cannot create reg Adam Walczykiewicz
• 14:15   Re: [HACKERS] ShmemCreate: cannot create reg Tom Lane
• 14:22   Re: [HACKERS] new backslash command of psql Bruce Momjian
• 15:35   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Don Baccus
• 15:58   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 16:09   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Ed Loehr
• 16:19   subscribe rob.c@virgilio.it
• 16:20   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Don Baccus
• 16:31   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Don Baccus
• 16:59   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 17:06   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Tom Lane
• 17:08   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 17:20   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 17:28   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Tom Lane
• 17:38   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Don Baccus
• 17:41   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 17:42   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Don Baccus
• 17:46   Re: [HACKERS] new backslash command of psql Peter Eisentraut
• 17:52   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-' Tom Lane
• 18:01   Re: [HACKERS] new backslash command of psql Bruce Momjian
• 18:25   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Kaare Rasmussen
• 18:26   TODO list / why 7.0 ? Kaare Rasmussen
• 18:27   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Tom Lane
• 18:31   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Don Baccus
• 18:41   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list / why 7.0 ? The Hermit Hacker
• 20:22   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list / why 7.0 ? Tom Lane
• 21:56   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Peter Eisentraut
• 21:56   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-' Peter Eisentraut
• 21:56   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level? Peter Eisentraut
• 21:59   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? The Hermit Hacker
• 22:39   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-' Don Baccus
• 22:39   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Don Baccus
• 22:56   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 23:00   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 23:09   RE: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-' Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:43   Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl man page Tatsuo Ishii

22 February 2000

• 01:36   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-' Tom Lane
• 01:52   RE: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-' Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:57   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Tom Lane
• 02:06   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-' Tom Lane
• 02:20   Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level? Tom Lane
• 02:33   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Bruce Momjian
• 02:46   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:54   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-' Tom Lane
• 03:11   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 03:26   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Don Baccus
• 03:26   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Don Baccus
• 03:32   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Tom Lane
• 03:34   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:45   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 03:49   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list / why 7.0 ? Kaare Rasmussen
• 03:54   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Tom Lane
• 04:33   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Ed Loehr
• 04:58   psql and pager Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:58   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Tom Lane
• 08:06   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Hannu Krosing
• 08:11   Re: [HACKERS] psql and pager Chris
• 08:14   Re: [HACKERS] psql and pager Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:16   Re: UESQLC Michael Meskes
• 08:28   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 08:30   Re: [HACKERS] psql and pager Oliver Elphick
• 08:34   Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Jeroen van Vianen
• 09:28   Big join breaks psql Alessio Bragadini
• 09:49   TRANSACTIONS Jose Soares
• 10:00   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Peter Eisentraut
• 10:08   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Peter Eisentraut
• 10:14   RE: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Dmitry Samersoff
• 10:18   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? sszabo@bigpanda.com
• 10:19   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Peter Eisentraut
• 10:21   Re: [HACKERS] psql and pager Peter Eisentraut
• 10:24   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? sszabo@bigpanda.com
• 10:31   Re: [HACKERS] psql and pager Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:47   Re: [HACKERS] psql and pager Peter Eisentraut
• 10:50   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Peter Eisentraut
• 11:13   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? The Hermit Hacker
• 11:15   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list / why 7.0 ? Peter Eisentraut
• 11:15   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? The Hermit Hacker
• 12:08   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 12:13   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 12:17   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 12:19   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 12:58   Out of memory problem (forwarded bug report) Oliver Elphick
• 13:06   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? The Hermit Hacker
• 13:25   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Don Baccus
• 13:25   PostgreSQL v7.0 goes Beta ... The Hermit Hacker
• 13:25   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Don Baccus
• 13:26   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Don Baccus
• 13:26   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Don Baccus
• 13:47   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Vince Vielhaber
• 13:49   Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 13:50   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Tom Lane
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 14:08   7.0beta1-0.2 testing RPMS are now available. Lamar Owen
• 14:13   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Tom Lane
• 14:21   Re: [HACKERS] Big join breaks psql Tom Lane
• 14:25   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 14:28   Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) The Hermit Hacker
• 14:33   Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Tom Lane
• 14:35   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Vince Vielhaber
• 14:37   Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL v7.0 goes Beta ... Duncan Kinder
• 14:57   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.0 goes Beta ... Tom Lane
• 15:07   Re: [HACKERS] Out of memory problem (forwarded bug report) Tom Lane
• 15:13   Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 15:17   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.0 goes Beta ... The Hermit Hacker
• 15:17   Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) Tom Lane
• 15:33   Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 15:49   Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL v7.0 goes Beta ... Bruce Momjian
• 16:45   subcription Nora Luz Escobar López
• 17:00   Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) Don Baccus
• 17:00   Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Don Baccus
• 17:01   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.0 goes Beta ... Don Baccus
• 17:55   ECPG / Release Michael Meskes
• 18:19   Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 18:33   Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release) The Hermit Hacker
• 18:47   Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release) Lamar Owen
• 18:56   Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release) Bruce Momjian
• 19:17   Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release) The Hermit Hacker
• 19:25   'now' in 7.0 Oleg Bartunov
• 19:33   Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release) The Hermit Hacker
• 20:12   Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release) Tom Lane
• 20:20   Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release) Bruce Momjian
• 20:20   Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release) Bruce Momjian
• 20:21   Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release) Bruce Momjian
• 20:29   Re: [HACKERS] 'now' in 7.0 Tom Lane
• 20:32   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.0 goes Beta ... Chris Bitmead
• 20:44   Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release) Tom Lane
• 21:00   Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release) Lamar Owen
• 21:44   Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release) The Hermit Hacker
• 21:44   Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release) The Hermit Hacker
• 21:48   Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release) The Hermit Hacker
• 22:15   Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release) Vince Vielhaber
• 23:19   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Peter Eisentraut
• 23:19   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Peter Eisentraut
• 23:19   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-' Peter Eisentraut
• 23:19   Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release) Peter Eisentraut
• 23:28   Re: Feature Request Bruce Momjian
• 23:30   Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release) Bruce Momjian
• 23:31   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian

23 February 2000

• 03:13   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-' Tom Lane
• 03:42   about 7.0 LIMIT optimization Roberto Cornacchia
• 03:48   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Tom Lane
• 03:57   pltcl and LDAP Joe Conway
• 04:04   Re: about 7.0 LIMIT optimization Tom Lane
• 04:15   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Tom Lane
• 05:26   Re: [HACKERS] Out of memory problem (forwarded bug report) Vladimír Beneš
• 06:27   AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 06:46   RE: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) Hiroshi Inoue
• 06:54   AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:08   AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:11   RE: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release) Peter Mount
• 08:29   RE: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 08:32   Re: [HACKERS] pltcl and LDAP wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:45   Re: [HACKERS] Big join breaks psql Alessio Bragadini
• 10:55   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Peter Eisentraut
• 11:00   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-' Peter Eisentraut
• 11:21   GNU make (Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages) Peter Eisentraut
• 11:27   Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Jose Soares
• 11:40   Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Jose Soares
• 11:45   Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Jose Soares
• 12:35   Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS sszabo@bigpanda.com
• 12:54   RE: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Dmitry Samersoff
• 13:17   Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Karl DeBisschop
• 13:43   Re: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Jose Soares
• 13:47   Re: [HACKERS] pltcl and LDAP wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:51   Re: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Don Baccus
• 13:55   Re: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Tom Lane
• 13:57   Re: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Mike Mascari
• 13:59   Re: Interested in writing a PostgreSQL article? Bruce Momjian
• 14:19   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-' Tom Lane
• 14:19   RE: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) Hiroshi Inoue
• 14:20   interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0 Don Baccus
• 14:30   Re: GNU make (Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages) Tom Lane
• 14:53   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 14:53   Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) Tom Lane
• 15:03   RE: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Hiroshi Inoue
• 15:03   Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0 Ed Loehr
• 15:07   Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0 Don Baccus
• 15:10   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 15:13   Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 15:34   RE: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) Hiroshi Inoue
• 16:34   Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:50   RE: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 18:13   Changes in 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 18:23   Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Feature Request Ross J. Reedstrom
• 20:41   Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) Tom Lane
• 20:55   Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0 Tom Lane
• 21:34   Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:35   Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0 Don Baccus
• 21:35   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Feature Request Don Baccus
• 21:39   Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) Tom Lane
• 21:47   Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0 Tom Lane
• 22:12   Re: about 7.0 LIMIT optimization Roberto Cornacchia
• 22:17   Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0 wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 22:28   Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 23:19   Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0 wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 23:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: about 7.0 LIMIT optimization Don Baccus
• 23:37   Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0 Don Baccus

24 February 2000

• 00:15   Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0 Tom Lane
• 00:22   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Interested in writing a PostgreSQL article? Jeff MacDonald
• 00:24   Re: about 7.0 LIMIT optimization Tom Lane
• 00:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: about 7.0 LIMIT optimization Tom Lane
• 00:37   Re: [HACKERS] Re: about 7.0 LIMIT optimization Don Baccus
• 03:47   Re: [HACKERS] Out of memory problem (forwarded bug report) Tom Lane
• 06:37   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Jeroen van Vianen
• 07:05   AW: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:09   AW: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:19   AW: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:51   Re: AW: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Oleg Bartunov
• 09:19   Re: [HACKERS] Out of memory problem (forwarded bug report) Oliver Elphick
• 10:06   Re: [HACKERS] Out of memory problem (forwarded bug report) Vladimír Beneš
• 10:47   Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Peter Eisentraut
• 10:51   Re: GNU make (Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages) Peter Eisentraut
• 11:05   Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0 Peter Eisentraut
• 11:28   Hacker Pages Fnet Sebastian Fack
• 12:26   Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 12:26   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 12:47   Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Don Baccus
• 12:53   Minor problems reloading dump in 7.0beta1 Magnus Hagander
• 13:12   Re: [HACKERS] Minor problems reloading dump in 7.0beta1 Peter Eisentraut
• 13:25   Re: AW: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Karl DeBisschop
• 13:29   Re: [HACKERS] Minor problems reloading dump in 7.0beta1 Bruce Momjian
• 13:29   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Tom Lane
• 13:35   7.0beta1 on Win32 Magnus Hagander
• 13:42   RE: [HACKERS] Minor problems reloading dump in 7.0beta1 Magnus Hagander
• 13:45   Re: [HACKERS] Out of memory problem (forwarded bug report) Tom Lane
• 13:46   Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0 Tom Lane
• 13:51   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 13:52   Re: [HACKERS] 7.0beta1 on Win32 Bruce Momjian
• 13:55   RE: [HACKERS] Minor problems reloading dump in 7.0beta1 Magnus Hagander
• 14:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Peter Eisentraut
• 14:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Tom Lane
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0 Peter Eisentraut
• 14:03   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Peter Eisentraut
• 14:06   Re: [HACKERS] Minor problems reloading dump in 7.0beta1 Tom Lane
• 14:11   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 14:12   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Tom Lane
• 14:12   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 14:16   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Lamar Owen
• 14:18   Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0 Tom Lane
• 14:24   Solid timer Post Message
• 14:30   Re: [HACKERS] Minor problems reloading dump in 7.0beta1 Bruce Momjian
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 14:35   Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Tom Lane
• 14:35   Solid time Post Message
• 14:36   Re: [HACKERS] Minor problems reloading dump in 7.0beta1 Bruce Momjian
• 14:40   Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Tom Lane
• 14:43   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 14:45   AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:45   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Rolf Grossmann
• 14:49   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Tom Lane
• 14:54   AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 15:03   Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Don Baccus
• 15:04   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Tom Lane
• 15:38   [HACKERS] Cache query implemented Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 16:12   Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Keith G. Murphy
• 16:36   problems with TEMP table (6.5.3) Oleg Bartunov
• 17:10   postgresql performance, smp vs non-smp Kyle
• 17:17   Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Karl DeBisschop
• 18:04   Re: [HACKERS] problems with TEMP table (6.5.3) Bruce Momjian
• 18:59   Re: [HACKERS] Re: about 7.0 LIMIT optimization Roberto Cornacchia
• 19:43   Re: about 7.0 LIMIT optimization Roberto Cornacchia
• 19:49   Re: [HACKERS] Re: about 7.0 LIMIT optimization Don Baccus
• 20:29   Re: AW: AW: AW: .... (off-topic) Hannu Krosing
• 21:08   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 The Hermit Hacker
• 21:08   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 The Hermit Hacker
• 21:37   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Peter Eisentraut
• 21:38   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Peter Eisentraut
• 21:38   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Peter Eisentraut
• 21:53   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Bruce Momjian
• 22:19   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Tom Lane
• 22:25   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Don Baccus
• 22:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Tom Lane
• 22:37   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Patch for more readable parse error messages Don Baccus
• 23:01   RE: AW: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:08   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 Rolf Grossmann

25 February 2000

• 03:00   ecpg seems rather badly broken Tom Lane
• 04:42   Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Lincoln Yeoh
• 05:07   Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: AW: AW: .... (off-topic) Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
• 07:53   failing to compile -current on FreeBSD Michael Reifenberger
• 09:00   Compile woes Michael Meskes
• 09:00   Re: ecpg seems rather badly broken Michael Meskes
• 11:55   Problem - Postgres Running continously Nedu
• 14:37   Re: missing function datetime() Tom Lane
• 14:48   Using libpq in a multithreaded environment Rini Dutta
• 16:20   Re: [HACKERS] Using libpq in a multithreaded environment Tom Lane
• 17:10   XML and Security M. Brady
• 17:28   Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Karl DeBisschop
• 18:49   LZTEXT for rule plan stings wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:15   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings The Hermit Hacker
• 19:34   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Don Baccus
• 20:04   subscribe Joaquin Eduardo Monje
• 22:54   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Hannu Krosing
• 23:18   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Tom Lane
• 23:19   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Tom Lane
• 23:19   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Don Baccus
• 23:34   ^C in psql (was Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0) Peter Eisentraut
• 23:35   Re: [HACKERS] Cache query implemented Peter Eisentraut

26 February 2000

• 01:11   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Don Baccus
• 01:11   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Don Baccus
• 01:11   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Don Baccus
• 01:19   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 02:32   ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Bruce Momjian
• 03:18   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Don Baccus
• 03:36   Re: [HACKERS] PC Week Labs benchmark results Tom Lane
• 04:02   Re: [HACKERS] ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Tom Lane
• 04:28   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Tom Lane
• 08:09   Web Site Opportunity for Database Expert esling@sandiway.u-net.com
• 10:33   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Hannu Krosing
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Don Baccus
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Don Baccus
• 14:02   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Bruce Momjian
• 15:15   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Tom Lane
• 18:42   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Don Baccus
• 18:43   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Don Baccus
• 19:35   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Tom Lane
• 19:45   Web page on bug reports Bruce Momjian
• 21:08   RE: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-' Hiroshi Inoue
• 21:47   Re: [HACKERS] Numeric with '-' Tom Lane
• 23:34   Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings Don Baccus
• 23:47   Re: [INTERFACES] Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 17:01:55 -0800 Tom Lane

27 February 2000

• 02:49   update_pg_pwd trigger does not work very well Tom Lane
• 03:36   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd trigger does not work very well Bruce Momjian
• 03:55    Ray Messier
• 04:58   Re: [HACKERS] Compile woes Tom Lane
• 08:54   Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0 Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:15   type coerce problem with lztext wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:56   Re: [HACKERS] type coerce problem with lztext Bruce Momjian
• 12:56   Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 13:50   Re: [HACKERS] type coerce problem with lztext Don Baccus
• 15:55   Re: [HACKERS] type coerce problem with lztext Tom Lane
• 15:58   Re: [HACKERS] ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Hannu Krosing
• 16:00   Is anyone working on pg_dump? Tom Lane
• 16:41   Re: [HACKERS] ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Don Baccus
• 16:58   Re: [HACKERS] type coerce problem with lztext Tom Lane
• 17:07   Re: [HACKERS] type coerce problem with lztext Bruce Momjian
• 18:47   Re: [HACKERS] type coerce problem with lztext wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:14   Re: [HACKERS] type coerce problem with lztext wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:18   Re: [HACKERS] type coerce problem with lztext Bruce Momjian
• 19:33   Re: [HACKERS] type coerce problem with lztext Don Baccus
• 19:36   Re: [HACKERS] type coerce problem with lztext Tom Lane
• 20:02   Re: [HACKERS] type coerce problem with lztext Tom Lane
• 20:24   Re: [HACKERS] type coerce problem with lztext Don Baccus
• 20:39   A further thought on rule string size Tom Lane
• 21:42   Rogue line in regression resultmap file. Keith Parks
• 21:52   Re: [HACKERS] type coerce problem with lztext Peter Eisentraut
• 21:52   Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Peter Eisentraut
• 21:53   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd trigger does not work very well Peter Eisentraut
• 21:54   Re: [HACKERS] Web page on bug reports Peter Eisentraut
• 21:56   Re: [HACKERS] Is anyone working on pg_dump? Peter Eisentraut
• 22:00   Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size Bruce Momjian
• 22:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Bruce Momjian
• 22:31   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd trigger does not work very well Bruce Momjian
• 23:54   RE: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Hiroshi Inoue

28 February 2000

• 00:04   Re: [HACKERS] Web page on bug reports Vince Vielhaber
• 00:13   Re: [HACKERS] Rogue line in regression resultmap file. Bruce Momjian
• 00:18   Re: [HACKERS] Web page on bug reports Bruce Momjian
• 00:24   Re: [HACKERS] type coerce problem with lztext Tom Lane
• 00:30   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Tom Lane
• 00:35   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Bruce Momjian
• 01:16   RE: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:40   RE: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN The Hermit Hacker
• 01:54   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Bruce Momjian
• 02:19   RE: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:34   RE: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Don Baccus
• 03:34   RE: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Don Baccus
• 03:49   info subaesh ramjan
• 05:11   RE: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:12   Syslog and pg_options (for RPMs) Lamar Owen
• 05:33   Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 05:46   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd trigger does not work very well wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 05:53   Re: [HACKERS] type coerce problem with lztext wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 05:59   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd trigger does not work very well wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 06:02   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd trigger does not work very well Tom Lane
• 06:02   AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 06:08   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 06:25   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd trigger does not work very well wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 06:28   Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size Bruce Momjian
• 06:41   Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 06:42   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Thomas Lockhart
• 07:13   Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size Bruce Momjian
• 07:14   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 07:37   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Hannu Krosing
• 08:04   Locale support broken in latest snapshots Oleg Broytmann
• 08:59   7.0 Changes list Bruce Momjian
• 09:36   Re: [HACKERS] Cache query implemented Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 10:50   Re: [HACKERS] Is anyone working on pg_dump? Mark Hollomon
• 11:21   RE: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN The Hermit Hacker
• 12:04   Re: [HACKERS] Cache query implemented Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 12:11   having and union in v7beta Jose Soares
• 12:34   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Don Baccus
• 12:35   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd trigger does not work very well Don Baccus
• 12:35   Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size Don Baccus
• 12:41   Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size Tom Lane
• 12:47   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Tom Lane
• 12:49   Re: [HACKERS] Locale support broken in latest snapshots Tom Lane
• 13:15   Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Tom Lane
• 13:17   Re: [HACKERS] 'now' in 7.0 Thomas Lockhart
• 13:21   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Tom Lane
• 13:25   bug in 7.0 Don Baccus
• 13:26   NOT NULL doesn't work in v7 Jose Soares
• 13:41   Re: [HACKERS] Locale support broken in latest snapshots Oleg Broytmann
• 13:43   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Don Baccus
• 13:45   Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0 Thomas Lockhart
• 13:51   Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Jose Soares
• 14:12   Re: [HACKERS] bug in 7.0 Tom Lane
• 14:13   Re: [HACKERS] NOT NULL doesn't work in v7 Tom Lane
• 14:17   Re: [HACKERS] Re: missing function datetime() Thomas Lockhart
• 14:27   Re: [HACKERS] Re: missing function datetime() Tom Lane
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] Web page on bug reports Thomas Lockhart
• 14:37   Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0 Tom Lane
• 15:42   ask sybase - postgres Joaquin Eduardo Monje
• 15:42   ask sybase - postgres Joaquin Eduardo Monje
• 17:38   [HACKERS] Re: Interested in writing a PostgreSQL article? Andrzej Mazurkiewicz
• 20:31   NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:41   Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Don Baccus
• 21:17   Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples Peter Eisentraut
• 21:17   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Peter Eisentraut
• 21:18   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Peter Eisentraut
• 21:18   Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Peter Eisentraut
• 21:26   Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Tom Lane
• 21:32   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Bruce Momjian
• 21:56   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Hannu Krosing
• 22:17   Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Tom Lane
• 22:40   Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 22:46   Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Tom Lane
• 22:55   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 23:01   Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Don Baccus
• 23:01   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Don Baccus
• 23:07   Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 23:45   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Don Baccus
• 23:59   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN sszabo@bigpanda.com

29 February 2000

• 00:01   Re: [HACKERS] 7.0beta1-0.2 testing RPMS are now available. Ryan Kirkpatrick
• 00:37   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 01:01   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Don Baccus
• 03:00   RE: [HACKERS] Cache query implemented Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:09   RE: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:38   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples Thomas Lockhart
• 03:41   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Tom Lane
• 03:45   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Thomas Lockhart
• 03:45   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples Tom Lane
• 04:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Bruce Momjian
• 04:34   RE: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN The Hermit Hacker
• 04:36   Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0 Thomas Lockhart
• 04:41   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Thomas Lockhart
• 05:02   RE: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Hiroshi Inoue
• 07:27   Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Jose Soares
• 07:27   Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Jose Soares
• 08:08   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Hannu Krosing
• 08:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Hannu Krosing
• 08:34   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:39   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 08:43   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:55   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples Peter Eisentraut
• 09:14   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Peter Eisentraut
• 10:25   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 10:34   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:54   RE: [HACKERS] Cache query implemented Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 11:20   RE: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN The Hermit Hacker
• 12:09   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Thomas Lockhart
• 12:15   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - return s multiplesh Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 12:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returnsmultiples Thomas Lockhart
• 12:42   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Don Baccus
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Don Baccus
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Don Baccus
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN Don Baccus
• 13:55   Re: Is anyone working on pg_dump? Tom Lane
• 13:56   Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0 Tom Lane
• 13:57   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Tom Lane
• 14:11   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Tom Lane
• 14:30   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Thomas Lockhart
• 14:37   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Peter Eisentraut
• 14:39   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Peter Eisentraut
• 14:49   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Peter Eisentraut
• 15:54   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Don Baccus
• 15:55   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Don Baccus
• 15:56   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Bruce Momjian
• 15:56   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Bruce Momjian
• 16:15   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Tom Lane
• 16:19   Re: [HACKERS] Syslog and pg_options (for RPMs) Massimo Dal Zotto
• 16:28   Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Tom Lane
• 16:35   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) The Hermit Hacker
• 16:55   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Don Baccus
• 17:10   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Don Baccus
• 17:19   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Vince Vielhaber
• 17:50   Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Tom Lane
• 18:06   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) The Hermit Hacker
• 22:05   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 23:12   Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...' The Hermit Hacker
• 23:14   minor bug in 7.0: casting The Hermit Hacker
• 23:30   RE: [HACKERS] Cache query implemented Hiroshi Inoue