At 10:04 AM 2/8/00 +0900, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>There's already -F option for speeding up.
>Who would want non-WAL mode with strict reliabilty after WAL
>is implemented ?
Exactly. I suspect WAL will actually run faster, or at least
will have that potential when its existence is fully exploited,
than non-WAL non -F.
And it seems to me that touching something as crucial as
disk management in a fundamental way one week before the
release of a hopefully solid beta is pushing things a bit.
But, then again, I'm the resident paranoid conservative, I
guess.
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
