Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jose Soares
Subject Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT
Date
Msg-id 3896DD49.26143978@sferacarta.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT
List pgsql-hackers

Don Baccus wrote:

> At 09:41 AM 1/31/00 +0100, Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> >    Of  course,  removing  END/ABORT will touch many applications
> >    using transactions, but I would vote  for  it  anyway,  since
> >    it's standard.
>
> Does it make all that much sense to worry about the actual word
> used when the need to use "begin" is non-standard to begin with?
  There is no explicit "BEGIN WORK" on SQL92, transaction initiation  is always implicit and it terminates either with
aCOMMIT or a
 
ROLLBACK  statement.

>
>
> Of course, removing that would REALLY impact current applications...
>
> - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
>   Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
>   Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
>   http://donb.photo.net.
>
> ************

--
Jose' Soares
Bologna, Italy                     Jose@sferacarta.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chris
Date:
Subject: Problem in current CVS
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problem in current CVS