Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I felt that the more advanced features like not using 2x disk space were
> quite hard to implement, considering the other TODO items. Marc agreed
> and was going to e-mail him to tell him that with proper user warning,
> we wanted the patch.
> Do people disagree?
Hmmm ... well ... I really don't want to restart that argument, but
I thought the plurality of opinion was that we didn't want it until
a more complete implementation could be provided.
Certainly I'm not enthused about shoehorning it in *after* we've
gone to feature-freeze mode. If beta means anything around here,
it means "you missed the bus for adding features".
regards, tom lane
