Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C
Date
Msg-id 12652.950979687@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> The longjmp seems to work but I need to test it more. I'm concerned how it
> will work across platforms, esp. Windows (being a POSIX thing). Should
> there be a configure test or can I assume it on every non-WIN32 system?

longjmp predates POSIX by an eon or two.  I doubt you need to worry about
it on Unix platforms.  (Since we utterly rely on it in the backend,
Postgres wouldn't ever work on a platform without it anyway.)

Less sure about the situation on Windows or Mac, but configure isn't
going to help for those anyway.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: UESQLC
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance