Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 200002031213.HAA20196@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL  (Chris <chris@bitmead.com>)
List pgsql-sql
> Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > I'll comment on the other issues later ... but I will say that I don't
> > think it's acceptable to add *any* overhead to standard-SQL queries
> > in order to support inheritance better.  The vast majority of our users
> > want SQL performance and don't give a damn about inheritance.  We have
> > to pay attention to that.
> 
> Well I see that pg_class has columns like "relhasindex". If we added a
> "relhassubclass", the overhead should be unmeasureable.

Yes, but how do you keep that accurate?  If I add indexes, then drop
them, does relhasindex go to false.  Could you do that for relhassubclass?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Next
From: Chris
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL