Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Chris
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 38994796.36079744@bitmead.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL  (Chris Bitmead <chrisb@nimrod.itg.telstra.com.au>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-sql
Tom Lane wrote:

> I'll comment on the other issues later ... but I will say that I don't
> think it's acceptable to add *any* overhead to standard-SQL queries
> in order to support inheritance better.  The vast majority of our users
> want SQL performance and don't give a damn about inheritance.  We have
> to pay attention to that.

Well I see that pg_class has columns like "relhasindex". If we added a
"relhassubclass", the overhead should be unmeasureable.


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL