Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Date
Msg-id 5899.951147713@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Beta for 4:30AST ... ?  (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?  (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> Not having heard anything otherwise, assume we can go Beta today, as
> planned?

Might as well --- we have open issues, but there'll always be open
issues.  I don't think anyone is still hoping to shoehorn new features
into 7.0, just bug fixes.  (Wait, does a unary-minus operator for
numeric count as a new feature ;-) ?)

I do suggest that we had better commit the current state of the rules
regress test output as the expected output, so that we don't have a
lot of confused beta-testers.  An actual fix will have to wait for
Thomas to return, but I don't think we want to put off going to beta
just because he's on vacation.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "j.j.geel"
Date:
Subject:
Next
From: "Adam Walczykiewicz"
Date:
Subject: ShmemCreate: cannot create reg