TODO list / why 7.0 ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kaare Rasmussen
Subject TODO list / why 7.0 ?
Date
Msg-id 00022121082604.00287@bering
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?  (Kaare Rasmussen <kar@webline.dk>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] TODO list / why 7.0 ?
Re: [HACKERS] TODO list / why 7.0 ?
List pgsql-hackers
Having been away for some time I'm very anxious to see that there's a 7.0
release coming very soon. I extracted the TODO list from the CVS (latest update
February 9).  The only really really big issue as I see it is referential
integrity. This is big, I admit but why going to 7.0 for this? Or is it because
it's long overdue (MSVC and stuff)?

There are other things that must have taken a lot of work, only it's not
mainstream the same way referential integrity is (PL/Perl and more). I had
hoped to find outer joins, but look forward to the next release if it will be
there.

Maybe I missed something in the TODO list or in the fixed list, but I couldn't
find VIEWs with UNIONs, which I understand would be solved by a rewrite of the
rules system.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kaare Rasmussen
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?