Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Date
Msg-id 200002282330.SAA24391@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> Thomas Lockhart writes:
> 
> > I'm not sure that I agree that multi-word character types are required
> > internally. Somehow that seems to just push the problem of
> > SQL92-specific syntax to another part of the code. We could just as
> > easily (?) translate *every* "xxx VARYING" to "varxxx" on input, and
> > do the inverse on output or pg_dump.
> 
> On the one hand I propose what seems like editing a handful of lines in
> the bootstrap scanner (an internal interface) to solve this problem once
> and for all. What you are proposing is that every client interface (libpq,
> SPI, PL du jour, who knows) will have to know a list of the latest hacks

libpq doesn't know anything about syntax.  It is mostly gram.y files.  I
think ecpg is the only other one that needs the fix.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0)
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN