Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases
Date
Msg-id 38AC110E.42C81175@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Almost there on column aliases  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases
List pgsql-hackers
> > I'm currently (2000-02-16 15:40 GMT) seeing the rules test
> > blank-filling the "bpchar" fields. Do you see that?

Hmm. Still seeing it; here is a snippet from a diff of
results/rules.out and expected/rules.out:

...
<  rtest_emp     | rtest_emp_ins   | CREATE RULE rtest_emp_insAS ON INSERT TO rtest_emp DOINSERT INTO rtest_emplog
(ename,who, "action", newsal, oldsal)VALUES (new.ename, getpgusername(),'hired     '::bpchar, new.salary,
'$0.00'::money);
...
>  rtest_emp     | rtest_emp_ins   | CREATE RULE rtest_emp_insAS ON INSERT TO rtest_emp DOINSERT INTO rtest_emplog
(ename,who, "action", newsal, oldsal)VALUES (new.ename, getpgusername(),'hired'::bpchar, new.salary, '$0.00'::money);
 
...

But if you are not seeing it, then perhaps my "make clean install"
isn't sufficient; I'll try a clean checkout sometime...
                   - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] create database doesn't work well in MULTIBYTE mode
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Definitional issue for INET types