Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

17 February 2000

• 00:32   RE: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:38   Re: [HACKERS] FYI: BNF for SQL93 and SQL-3 Chris Bitmead
• 00:42   psql problem Chris Bitmead
• 01:12   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 01:24   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' Tom Lane
• 01:31   Re: [HACKERS] psql problem Tom Lane
• 01:35   Re: [HACKERS] psql problem] Bruce Momjian
• 01:37   Re: [HACKERS] psql problem Bruce Momjian
• 02:03   Re: [HACKERS] psql problem Tom Lane
• 02:48   Re: [HACKERS] psql problem Chris Bitmead
• 03:41   Re: [HACKERS] create database doesn't work well in MULTIBYTE mode Bruce Momjian
• 03:54   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change Thomas Lockhart
• 03:59   RE: [HACKERS] create database doesn't work well in MULTIBYTE mode Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:07   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Thomas Lockhart
• 04:12   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Tom Lane
• 04:22   Re: SQL compliance, was Re: [HACKERS] follow-up on PC Week Labsbenchmark results Thomas Lockhart
• 04:30   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change Tom Lane
• 04:31   Re: [HACKERS] libpq Chris Bitmead
• 05:02   Re: [HACKERS] libpq Tom Lane
• 05:04   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' Thomas Lockhart
• 05:25   Definitional issue for INET types Tom Lane
• 05:28   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Tom Lane
• 05:39   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' Tom Lane
• 07:22   Re: [HACKERS] FYI: BNF for SQL93 and SQL-3 Hannu Krosing
• 08:57   Re: [HACKERS] psql problem Vince Vielhaber
• 09:17   Re: [HACKERS] psql problem Peter Eisentraut
• 09:21   Re: [HACKERS] psql problem Peter Eisentraut
• 09:25   Re: [HACKERS] psql password prompt Peter Eisentraut
• 09:32   Re: [HACKERS] function question yet again Christof Petig
• 09:49   Re: [HACKERS] create database doesn't work well in MULTIBYTE mode Peter Eisentraut
• 10:00   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change Peter Eisentraut
• 10:10   Re: [HACKERS] Definitional issue for INET types Sevo Stille
• 10:11   Re: [HACKERS] Definitional issue for INET types Peter Eisentraut
• 12:10   PC Week PostgreSQL benchmark results posted online (fwd) Jeff MacDonald
• 12:33   Re: [HACKERS] create database doesn't work well in MULTIBYTE mode Thomas Lockhart
• 12:44   Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8' Thomas Lockhart
• 12:49   Re: [HACKERS] PC Week PostgreSQL benchmark results posted online (fwd) Thomas Lockhart
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] create database doesn't work well in MULTIBYTE mode Thomas Lockhart
• 13:10   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Thomas Lockhart
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] Definitional issue for INET types Tom Lane
• 13:49   Re: [HACKERS] Definitional issue for INET types Tom Lane
• 13:58   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Tom Lane
• 14:08   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change Tom Lane
• 14:12   Re: [HACKERS] Definitional issue for INET types Sevo Stille
• 14:24   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Tom Lane
• 14:38   Re: [HACKERS] Definitional issue for INET types Tom Lane
• 15:00   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Bruce Momjian
• 15:04   psql and Control-C Peter Eisentraut
• 16:44   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Michael Meskes
• 16:44   Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big changeu Michael Meskes
• 17:12   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Thomas Lockhart
• 17:46   Re: [HACKERS] function question yet again Michael Meskes
• 18:25   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Bruce Momjian
• 20:20   Re: [HACKERS] PC Week PostgreSQL benchmark results posted online (fwd) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:27   Re: [HACKERS] libpq Chris Bitmead
• 21:37   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Chris Bitmead
• 21:40   password change / table creation Herr Dumont
• 21:41   Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases Tom Lane
• 21:42   Re: [HACKERS] FYI: BNF for SQL93 and SQL-3 Chris Bitmead
• 22:05   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Chris Bitmead
• 22:05   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Alfred Perlstein
• 22:12   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Bruce Momjian
• 22:19   Re: [HACKERS] create database doesn't work well in MULTIBYTE mode Peter Eisentraut
• 22:23   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Peter Eisentraut
• 23:23   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Chris Bitmead
• 23:24   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Chris Bitmead
• 23:27   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Chris Bitmead
• 23:54   Re: [HACKERS] psql and Control-C Alfred Perlstein