Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.02A.10002171258480.2933-100000@Oxe.DoCS.UU.SE
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Date/time types: big change
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> I think it's too late in the 7.0 cycle to start thinking about renaming
> the numeric types.

I didn't mean that this should happen now or even soon. It was more of a
policy/practice inquiry.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] create database doesn't work well in MULTIBYTE mode
Next
From: Sevo Stille
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Definitional issue for INET types