Home > mailing lists

Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 March 2000

00:32 RE: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...' Hiroshi Inoue
01:14 Re: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...' Bruce Momjian
01:18 select exists (select oid from users) The Hermit Hacker
02:03 Poll: Databases for Linux The Hermit Hacker
02:17 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Christopher Sawtell
02:21 Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux Bruce Momjian
03:42 Re: [HACKERS] minor bug in 7.0: casting Tom Lane
03:50 RE: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...' Hiroshi Inoue
04:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Thomas Lockhart
04:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Tom Lane
04:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Bruce Momjian
04:36 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Thomas Lockhart
04:41 Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Thomas Lockhart
04:54 Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Tom Lane
05:33 Re: [HACKERS] Compile woes Michael Meskes
07:21 Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux Oleg Broytmann
07:35 RE: [HACKERS] Cache query implemented Karel Zak - Zakkr
08:19 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Karel Zak - Zakkr
08:38 RE: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...' Karel Zak - Zakkr
10:21 Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Jose Soares
11:24 Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Jose Soares
11:35 rpms Sergio A. Kessler
11:48 Re: Bugs in Postgres Thomas Lockhart
11:50 Re: [HACKERS] rpms Thomas Lockhart
12:22 Re: [HACKERS] rpms Sergio A. Kessler
12:36 Re: [HACKERS] rpms Sergio A. Kessler
12:47 Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Peter Eisentraut
12:49 Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Peter Eisentraut
13:03 patch for plperl Makefile.PL Mark Hollomon
13:03 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Peter Eisentraut
13:04 Where's the SQL3 spec? Peter Eisentraut
13:15 Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Peter Eisentraut
13:35 Re: [HACKERS] Where's the SQL3 spec? Kardos, Dr. Andreas
13:40 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bugs in Postgres Tom Lane
13:47 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Karel Zak - Zakkr
13:52 BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Tom Lane
14:02 PostgreSQL on Solaris/SPARC with gcc Horák Daniel
14:14 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL on Solaris/SPARC with gcc Oleg Broytmann
14:25 Re: [HACKERS] rpms Thomas Lockhart
14:35 Re: [HACKERS] Where's the SQL3 spec? Ross J. Reedstrom
14:41 Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Thomas Lockhart
14:44 Re: bit types Bruce Momjian
14:45 Psql and \H option Bruce Momjian
15:02 Re: [HACKERS] rpms Lamar Owen
15:32 Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types Ross J. Reedstrom
15:50 Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Tom Lane
16:10 Locking Jeff MacDonald
16:36 Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Peter Eisentraut
16:47 Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types Tom Lane
17:07 Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Tom Lane
17:11 Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types Ross J. Reedstrom
17:14 Re: [HACKERS] patch for plperl Makefile.PL Bruce Momjian
17:24 Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types Bruce Momjian
17:30 SQL92 standard corrections Ross J. Reedstrom
17:32 Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types Bruce Momjian
17:57 empty dates and changing the default date behaviour Willy De la Court
17:59 Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Tom Lane
18:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Hannu Krosing
18:24 Re: [HACKERS] empty dates and changing the default date behaviour Tom Lane
18:24 Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Vince Vielhaber
18:26 Re: bit types Adriaan Joubert
18:42 RE: [HACKERS] empty dates and changing the default date behaviour Willy De la Court
19:01 Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Bruce Momjian
22:49 RE: [HACKERS] empty dates and changing the default date behaviour Willy De la Court

2 March 2000

01:51 Re: [HACKERS] empty dates and changing the default date behaviour Tom Lane
02:03 bitten by docs Alfred Perlstein
02:18 Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs Tom Lane
04:21 Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Thomas Lockhart
04:40 Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs Thomas Lockhart
04:41 Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs Thomas Lockhart
06:55 AW: [HACKERS] Locking Zeugswetter Andreas SB
07:04 AW: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Zeugswetter Andreas SB
09:14 Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs Vince Vielhaber
09:19 Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs Alfred Perlstein
12:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Peter Eisentraut
12:40 Re: SQL compliance Thomas Lockhart
13:12 Re: AW: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Tom Lane
13:14 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Karel Zak - Zakkr
13:23 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Karel Zak - Zakkr
14:02 Re: [HACKERS] rpms Peter Eisentraut
14:14 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL on Solaris/SPARC with gcc Peter Eisentraut
14:23 Re: AW: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Peter Eisentraut
14:32 Re: [HACKERS] bitten by docs Bruce Momjian
14:32 SPI and qCache and bug? Karel Zak - Zakkr
14:36 Re: [HACKERS] rpms Thomas Lockhart

3 March 2000

10:37 Re: [HACKERS] rpms Sergio A. Kessler
17:00 Re: [HACKERS] rpms Henry B. Hotz
18:47 Re: [HACKERS] rpms Lamar Owen
22:44 Re: [HACKERS] rpms Fernando Magari1os Lamas

4 March 2000

15:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Peter Eisentraut
15:04 Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Peter Eisentraut
15:05 Re: [GENERAL] Version 7.0 beta problem Peter Eisentraut
15:05 ACL enhancements (was Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE) Peter Eisentraut
23:48 TransactionStateData and AbsoluteTime Tatsuo Ishii

5 March 2000

07:03 DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tatsuo Ishii
07:27 Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta Brian Hirt
11:27 pg_pwd trigger to be removed Peter Eisentraut
11:34 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Peter Eisentraut
11:37 Re: [HACKERS] TransactionStateData and AbsoluteTime Peter Eisentraut
12:13 Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta Peter Eisentraut
19:02 Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta Brian Hirt
23:34 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Mike Mascari

6 March 2000

04:07 xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. Alexei Zakharov
04:59 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Peter Eisentraut
05:07 Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta Peter Eisentraut
05:28 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Philip Warner
06:06 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Mike Mascari
06:31 AW: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Zeugswetter Andreas SB
08:08 Re: AW: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Peter Eisentraut
08:11 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Peter Eisentraut
08:28 AW: AW: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Zeugswetter Andreas SB
08:47 Re: AW: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Mike Mascari
11:48 Re: ACL enhancements Karel Zak - Zakkr
13:58 Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme Peter Eisentraut
16:39 Re: [HACKERS] Re: ACL enhancements Ross J. Reedstrom
21:05 Re: [HACKERS] TransactionStateData and AbsoluteTime Thomas Lockhart
22:38 sqgfault on initdb with current CVS Ross J. Reedstrom
23:08 Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS Tatsuo Ishii
23:36 Re: [HACKERS] TransactionStateData and AbsoluteTime Tatsuo Ishii

7 March 2000

01:34 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme Bruce Momjian
03:05 Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS Ross J. Reedstrom
03:08 Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS Thomas Lockhart
03:18 Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. yutaka tanida
04:56 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Version 7.0 beta problem Tom Lane
04:59 Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Tom Lane
05:55 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane
06:07 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tatsuo Ishii
06:10 Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta Tom Lane
06:17 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme Tom Lane
12:53 alter_table.sql Patrick Welche
13:09 ECPG restructuring Michael Meskes
13:09 library policy question Michael Meskes
13:42 Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Thomas Lockhart
14:06 CREATE VIEW fix Thomas Lockhart
14:15 How can I create trigger on system table, for on example pg_class ??? Andrzej Mazurkiewicz
14:20 Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Tom Lane
14:34 Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Tom Lane
14:42 Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Patrick Welche
14:48 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane
14:49 Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Thomas Lockhart
14:58 Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Lamar Owen
15:02 Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Tom Lane
15:23 Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Patrick Welche
17:26 SCHEMA support (was Re: DROP TABLE inside a transaction block) Ross J. Reedstrom
17:30 Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Tom Lane
17:42 Re: [HACKERS] CREATE VIEW fix Ross J. Reedstrom
20:54 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Bruce Momjian
21:08 Re: [HACKERS] library policy question The Hermit Hacker
21:23 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Tom Lane
21:27 Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Bruce Momjian
21:37 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian
21:40 Re: [HACKERS] pg_pwd trigger to be removed Bruce Momjian
21:41 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian
21:50 Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. Bruce Momjian
21:53 'LIKE' enhancement JB
22:04 'LIKE' enhancement suggestion JB
22:07 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme Bruce Momjian
22:08 Casts in 7.0 vs 6.5 (was Re: [SQL] 7.0beta bug (or feature)?) Tom Lane
22:10 Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS Bruce Momjian
22:14 Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. Bruce Momjian
22:15 Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta Tom Lane
22:19 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian
22:19 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian
22:22 Re: [HACKERS] pg_pwd trigger to be removed Tom Lane
22:32 Re: [HACKERS] 'LIKE' enhancement suggestion Tom Lane
22:56 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane
23:05 Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. Tom Lane
23:10 Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS The Hermit Hacker
23:15 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane
23:18 pSQL auth Jacopo Silva
23:21 Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. The Hermit Hacker
23:25 Re: [HACKERS] 'LIKE' enhancement suggestion JB
23:29 Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Tom Lane
23:31 Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Bruce Momjian
23:33 Re: [HACKERS] CREATE VIEW fix Bruce Momjian
23:36 Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Bruce Momjian
23:45 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Bruce Momjian
23:50 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian
23:51 Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. Bruce Momjian
23:54 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian

8 March 2000

00:49 Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. D. Jay Newman
01:03 Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. Tatsuo Ishii
01:18 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Lamar Owen
02:56 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian
03:08 Re: [HACKERS] 'LIKE' enhancement suggestion Tom Lane
03:20 Re: [HACKERS] 'LIKE' enhancement suggestion The Hermit Hacker
03:21 Re: [HACKERS] CREATE VIEW fix Thomas Lockhart
03:40 Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Thomas Lockhart
03:43 Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. The Hermit Hacker
03:48 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Thomas Lockhart
03:51 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block The Hermit Hacker
03:51 Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. Bruce Momjian
03:56 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian
04:07 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Philip Warner
04:08 Re: [HACKERS] xlog.c.patch for cygwin port. The Hermit Hacker
04:25 Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Michael Meskes
04:28 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Chris Bitmead
04:56 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane
05:02 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian
05:24 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Philip Warner
05:34 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian
06:15 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Mike Mascari
06:32 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane
06:33 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Philip Warner
06:42 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane
07:36 RE: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Hiroshi Inoue
08:09 RE: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Hiroshi Inoue
16:27 Regression test failure (runcheck) Keith Parks
16:28 regex (from TODO) Karel Zak - Zakkr
16:28 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Tom Lane
16:28 Re: Casts in 7.0 vs 6.5 (was Re: [SQL] 7.0beta bug (or feature)?) Kyle Bateman
16:29 Re: [HACKERS] pSQL auth Michael Meskes
16:29 Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Michael Meskes
16:33 Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Michael Meskes
16:39 [HACKERS] SPI and qCache and bug? Karel Zak - Zakkr
16:39 [HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling Ed Loehr
16:46 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Michael Alan Dorman
16:46 Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Thomas Lockhart
16:47 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Mark Hollomon
16:59 Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Patrick Welche
17:30 Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Tom Lane
17:36 Re: [HACKERS] regex (from TODO) Bruce Momjian
17:38 Re: [HACKERS] Regression test failure (runcheck) Bruce Momjian
17:50 Re: [HACKERS] library policy question Tom Lane
17:55 Re: [HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling Tom Lane
18:15 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block The Hermit Hacker
19:17 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Lamar Owen
19:20 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Ross J. Reedstrom
21:27 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian
21:53 Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql Tom Lane
22:11 Re: [HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling Ed Loehr
22:23 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Ross J. Reedstrom
22:38 RE: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Hiroshi Inoue
23:03 Re: [HACKERS] regex (from TODO) Tatsuo Ishii
23:05 Re: [HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling Tom Lane

9 March 2000

00:02 Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block Bruce Momjian
02:22 Re: [HACKERS] Transaction abortions & recovery handling Ed Loehr
03:33 Unrecognised machine in 7.0beta1 Adriaan Joubert
03:50 test ... The Hermit Hacker
04:04 ignore The Hermit Hacker
04:12 Ack ... The Hermit Hacker
04:18 work ... The Hermit Hacker
04:21 something just isn't right ... The Hermit Hacker
04:26 arg .. The Hermit Hacker

30 March 2000

18:06 Archivses ... The Hermit Hacker
18:15 RE: row level locking vs concurrency ? Vince Vielhaber
18:23 [TEST] Archives should now work again ... The Hermit Hacker
18:27 Re: Release schedule (was Re: Improvement in SET commandsyntax) Vince Vielhaber
18:34 Re: Release schedule (was Re: Improvement in SET commandsyntax) Vince Vielhaber
20:43 Docs refreshed Thomas Lockhart
21:25 Mailing list round trip time Thomas Lockhart
22:04 Re: Release schedule (was Re: Improvement in SET commandsyntax) Bruce Momjian
22:26 Re: slow join on postgresql6.5 Don Baccus
22:28 Re: slow join on postgresql6.5 Don Baccus

31 March 2000

03:46 Re: BIT datatype Michael Meskes
04:02 Regress test updates: status report Tom Lane
04:13 Re: BIT datatype Thomas Lockhart
06:25 Re: 6.5.0 datetime bug? gravity@dds.nl
07:18 Postresql & triggers Sergey V. Mikheev
08:00 RE: slow join on postgresql6.5 Hiroshi Inoue
08:03 Re: BIT datatype Michael Meskes
08:33 Re: ...copy hack Daniele Medri
09:42 Function tables from my book Bruce Momjian
09:44 Re: ...copy hack Daniele Medri
10:14 RE: slow join on postgresql6.5 Don Baccus
10:48 RE: ...copy hack Magnus Hagander
11:52 RE: Call for platform reports Horák Daniel
11:57 pgAccess change Lamar Owen
12:07 Re: pgAccess change Bruce Momjian
12:15 Re: Call for platform reports Bruce Momjian
12:19 Regression tests Bruce Momjian
12:25 Re: pgAccess change Lamar Owen
12:29 Re: pgAccess change Bruce Momjian
12:35 Re: Regress test updates: status report Lamar Owen
12:38 Re: pgAccess change Lamar Owen
12:40 Re: Docs refreshed Thomas Lockhart
12:45 Re: pgAccess change Bruce Momjian
12:46 Re: pgAccess change Vince Vielhaber
12:48 Re: Regression tests Lamar Owen
12:49 Re: 6.5.0 datetime bug? Thomas Lockhart
13:27 Re: 6.5.0 datetime bug? Thomas Lockhart
13:34 procedure returns a tuple Karel Zak
13:41 Re: 6.5.0 datetime bug? Maarten Boekhold
14:44 Re: 6.5.0 datetime bug? Thomas Lockhart
18:50 Re: Regression tests Don Baccus
20:06 Re: New config.{sub|guess} Peter Eisentraut
20:20 Re: Docs refreshed Peter Eisentraut
23:45 [6.5.3] first spinlock problem I've ever noticed ... The Hermit Hacker
23:48 [6.5.3] further investigation ... The Hermit Hacker