Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0003040434200.489-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE  (Karel Zak - Zakkr <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Karel Zak - Zakkr writes:

> > I read about that in SQL3 yesterday and I think we could transparently
> > adapt the current group scheme to it.
> 
>  Sorry, I skip this part in my previous letter. Why you mean adaptation
> to current group scheme?

I said adapt the current group scheme to roles. The current groups are a
functional subset of what roles do.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Fernando Magari1os Lamas"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] rpms
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST)