Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Karel Zak - Zakkr
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.3.96.1000302161415.3304D-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE  (Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Karel Zak - Zakkr wrote:
> 
> >  Yes. Just today I look at Oracle's documentation for ROLEs, PROFILEs
> > ... my idea is prepare acl/account code for this freatures too. What?
> 
> I read about that in SQL3 yesterday and I think we could transparently
> adapt the current group scheme to it.
Sorry, I skip this part in my previous letter. Why you mean adaptation
to current group scheme?
                    Karel

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Karel Zak - Zakkr
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] rpms