Re: bit types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: bit types
Date
Msg-id 200003011636.LAA08033@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@wallace.ece.rice.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Bruce,
> 
>     The bit-type that is in contrib is useless as it stands. Those are
> only C-routines to implement the functionality, and there are none of
> the SQL functions to actually make these usable. This really needs to be
> integrated with postgres proper. I don't know how to go about this and
> that is why I asked for help. I'm prepared to do whatever SQL function
> definitions are needed, do the regression tests etc. Would it be better
> to go back to the hackers mailing list to ask for help? Has this missed
> 7.0 now? If so, we'd better remove the bit-type from contrib.

I clearly dropped the ball on this one.  Don't think it can go into 7.0
because it would require catalog changes/initdb.  However, I would like
to keep it in contrib and add it as soon as 7.0 finalizes and we move to
7.1.


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Psql and \H option