Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 March 2000

• 00:32   RE: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...' Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:14   Re: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...' Bruce Momjian
• 01:18   select exists (select oid from users) The Hermit Hacker
• 02:03   Poll: Databases for Linux The Hermit Hacker
• 02:17   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Christopher Sawtell
• 02:21   Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux Bruce Momjian
• 03:42   Re: [HACKERS] minor bug in 7.0: casting Tom Lane
• 03:50   RE: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...' Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:04   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Thomas Lockhart
• 04:30   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Tom Lane
• 04:30   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Bruce Momjian
• 04:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh Thomas Lockhart
• 04:41   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Thomas Lockhart
• 04:54   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Tom Lane
• 05:33   Re: [HACKERS] Compile woes Michael Meskes
• 07:21   Re: [HACKERS] Poll: Databases for Linux Oleg Broytmann
• 07:35   RE: [HACKERS] Cache query implemented Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 08:19   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 08:38   RE: [HACKERS] Bug report for 7.0beta1 in 'CREATE FUNCTION...' Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 10:21   Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Jose Soares
• 11:24   Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Jose Soares
• 11:35   rpms Sergio A. Kessler
• 11:48   Re: Bugs in Postgres Thomas Lockhart
• 11:50   Re: [HACKERS] rpms Thomas Lockhart
• 12:22   Re: [HACKERS] rpms Sergio A. Kessler
• 12:36   Re: [HACKERS] rpms Sergio A. Kessler
• 12:47   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Peter Eisentraut
• 12:49   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Peter Eisentraut
• 13:03   patch for plperl Makefile.PL Mark Hollomon
• 13:03   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Peter Eisentraut
• 13:04   Where's the SQL3 spec? Peter Eisentraut
• 13:15   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Peter Eisentraut
• 13:35   Re: [HACKERS] Where's the SQL3 spec? Kardos, Dr. Andreas
• 13:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bugs in Postgres Tom Lane
• 13:47   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] NO-CREATE-TABLE and NO-LOCK-TABLE Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 13:52   BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Tom Lane
• 14:02   PostgreSQL on Solaris/SPARC with gcc Horák Daniel
• 14:14   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL on Solaris/SPARC with gcc Oleg Broytmann
• 14:25   Re: [HACKERS] rpms Thomas Lockhart
• 14:35   Re: [HACKERS] Where's the SQL3 spec? Ross J. Reedstrom
• 14:41   Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:44   Re: bit types Bruce Momjian
• 14:45   Psql and \H option Bruce Momjian
• 15:02   Re: [HACKERS] rpms Lamar Owen
• 15:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types Ross J. Reedstrom
• 15:50   Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Tom Lane
• 16:10   Locking Jeff MacDonald
• 16:36   Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Peter Eisentraut
• 16:47   Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types Tom Lane
• 17:07   Re: [HACKERS] having and union in v7beta Tom Lane
• 17:11   Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types Ross J. Reedstrom
• 17:14   Re: [HACKERS] patch for plperl Makefile.PL Bruce Momjian
• 17:24   Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types Bruce Momjian
• 17:30   SQL92 standard corrections Ross J. Reedstrom
• 17:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: bit types Bruce Momjian
• 17:57   empty dates and changing the default date behaviour Willy De la Court
• 17:59   Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Tom Lane
• 18:04   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Hannu Krosing
• 18:24   Re: [HACKERS] empty dates and changing the default date behaviour Tom Lane
• 18:24   Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) Vince Vielhaber
• 18:26   Re: bit types Adriaan Joubert
• 18:42   RE: [HACKERS] empty dates and changing the default date behaviour Willy De la Court
• 19:01   Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST) Bruce Momjian
• 22:49   RE: [HACKERS] empty dates and changing the default date behaviour Willy De la Court