Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hannu Krosing
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0)
Date
Msg-id 38BD79E0.FF6E9FB2@tm.ee
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0)  (wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOT {NULL|DEFERRABLE} (was: bug in 7.0)  (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jan Wieck wrote:
> 
>     What  I  suggest  is,  take  it  as  it  is. We use to have a
>     friendly and nice ground noise in our mailing lists. So  this
>     kind  of  discussion, tending to become flame wars, should be
>     taken off list at least (IMHO avoided at all, but I'm  farest
>     the last person to judge).
>

Maybe we need psql-flamewars@postgresql.org where we could migrate 
these threads ? or even psql-hackers-flamewars@postgresql.org ;)

I just read on NYTimes direct that a consulting firm has started 
educating businesmens wives to not slurp soup or misbehave in other 
ways.

We could possibly hire them to consult the hackers list too ;)

I'm sure PostgreSQL Inc. would accept donations to that end ;-p

---------
Hannu
(answers to psql-flamewars@postgresql.org please)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BIT/BIT VARYING names (was Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] empty dates and changing the default date behaviour