Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Date
Msg-id 38BCB55B.AC175BB9@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-sql
> So are we willing to field questions from people trying to use TEMP
> tables and trying TEMP and not TEMPORARY.  I realize the restriction on
> a field called TEMP, but we don't get those very often.  How many people
> are going to guess TEMP and not TEMPORARY?

Well, that's one reason to stick to a published standard. No guessing
required since one could look it up ;)
                 - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Sawtell
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh