Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block
Date
Msg-id 200003080017.TAA04546@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] DROP TABLE inside a transaction block  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> BTW, we are not *that* far from being able to roll back a DROP TABLE.
> The only thing that's really needed is for everyone to take a deep
> breath and let go of the notion that table files ought to be named
> after the tables.  If we named table files after the OIDs of their
> tables, then rollback-able DROP or RENAME TABLE would be pretty
> straightforward.  If you don't recall why this is, consult the
> pghackers archives...

The oid will be appended to the base file name.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer badness in 7.0 beta
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_pwd trigger to be removed