> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Thanks. I'm building a test RPM here so I can satisfy Tom's request for
> > > regress results on CURRENT. My rpm patchset barfed on pgaccess -- so I
> > > investigated. I fixed it in my local tree, but wanted to alert folk.
>
> > Glad you found it. That was the one file I had to modify to get it to
> > match our old version, and obviously I messed that up.
>
> I'm going to take this opportunity to thank Marc for having a cvsweb
> interface -- as I was able to see when the difference was introduced
> using that interface.
>
> Given the number of things you patch, Bruce, it shouldn't surprise
> anyone that an occassional error is introduced -- that's why it's good
> to have many sets of eyes looking at the code. I can only have
> nightmares about how many errors I could cause if I were applying
> patches at that rate... :-)
The problem with pgaccess is that is not a patch I can eyeball. It is a
stand-alone tar file that writes over our files. I am never sure what
is new or old until I see what files show as new, etc.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
