Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

31 March 2000

• 03:46   Re: BIT datatype Michael Meskes
• 04:02   Regress test updates: status report Tom Lane
• 04:13   Re: BIT datatype Thomas Lockhart
• 06:25   Re: 6.5.0 datetime bug? gravity@dds.nl
• 07:18   Postresql & triggers Sergey V. Mikheev
• 08:00   RE: slow join on postgresql6.5 Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:03   Re: BIT datatype Michael Meskes
• 08:33   Re: ...copy hack Daniele Medri
• 09:42   Function tables from my book Bruce Momjian
• 09:44   Re: ...copy hack Daniele Medri
• 10:14   RE: slow join on postgresql6.5 Don Baccus
• 10:48   RE: ...copy hack Magnus Hagander
• 11:52   RE: Call for platform reports Horák Daniel
• 11:57   pgAccess change Lamar Owen
• 12:07   Re: pgAccess change Bruce Momjian
• 12:15   Re: Call for platform reports Bruce Momjian
• 12:19   Regression tests Bruce Momjian
• 12:25   Re: pgAccess change Lamar Owen
• 12:29   Re: pgAccess change Bruce Momjian
• 12:35   Re: Regress test updates: status report Lamar Owen
• 12:38   Re: pgAccess change Lamar Owen
• 12:40   Re: Docs refreshed Thomas Lockhart
• 12:45   Re: pgAccess change Bruce Momjian
• 12:46   Re: pgAccess change Vince Vielhaber
• 12:48   Re: Regression tests Lamar Owen
• 12:49   Re: 6.5.0 datetime bug? Thomas Lockhart
• 13:27   Re: 6.5.0 datetime bug? Thomas Lockhart
• 13:34   procedure returns a tuple Karel Zak
• 13:41   Re: 6.5.0 datetime bug? Maarten Boekhold
• 14:44   Re: 6.5.0 datetime bug? Thomas Lockhart
• 18:50   Re: Regression tests Don Baccus
• 20:06   Re: New config.{sub|guess} Peter Eisentraut
• 20:20   Re: Docs refreshed Peter Eisentraut
• 23:45   [6.5.3] first spinlock problem I've ever noticed ... The Hermit Hacker
• 23:48   [6.5.3] further investigation ... The Hermit Hacker