Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?
Date
Msg-id 200002190038.TAA20900@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>)
List pgsql-hackers
I believe it is Interbase that does not support the -- comment.

> Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > 
> > I've since seen the article in the latest issue of PCWeek. The article
> > was not at all clear on the *specific* features which would disqualify
> > Postgres from having SQL92 entry level compliance (for most commercial
> > RDBMSes this is the only level they attain), and I was amused to note
> > that although InterBase was lauded for SQL92 compliance, the author
> > did encourage them to consider supporting the SQL92 comment delimiter
> > ("--") in their next release :))
> 
> Why does PostgreSQL _not_ support the -- comment delimiter ?
> 
> Is there something complicated to supporting it in parser ?
> 
> IMNSHO it would require only a few lines in gram.y
> 
> Does supporting user-defined operators interfere ?
> 
> I assume we could comfortably disallow -- as a possible operator (one 
> can't input it from interactive psql anyway)
> 
> --------------
> Hannu
> 
> ************
> 


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?
Next
From: Roberto Cornacchia
Date:
Subject: Generalized Top Queries on PostgreSQL