Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.02A.10002241700400.17421-100000@Hummer.DoCS.UU.SE
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> For a COPY OUT (from the backend), the correct behavior is same as for
> non-copy state: fire off the cancel request and then forget about it.

Do I have to call PQendcopy() is the question.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0