Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.02A.10002291737320.18993-100000@Rama.DoCS.UU.SE
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh  (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>)
List pgsql-sql
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Don Baccus wrote:

> I vote for the SQL92 TEMPORARY.  Let's not add a keyword that is non-standard
> just because one or another commercial database makes use of it, unless
> there's some real functionality to be gained that's not covered by the
> standard.

The difference is that TEMP is already a keyword since 6.5 and we're
considering removing it.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh