Re: Is anyone working on pg_dump? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Is anyone working on pg_dump?
Date
Msg-id 28997.951838117@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Is anyone working on pg_dump?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> One of the major must-fix items remaining on my to-do-for-7.0 list
> is making pg_dump smarter about the order to dump stuff in, so as
> to avoid problems like table constraints referring to not-yet-
> defined functions.

I spent a couple evenings working on this, and have made good progress;
but looking at how much I've changed and how much remains, I'm forced
to realize that this is "too big a change for beta".  It requires a
major restructuring of pg_dump.  Since we don't have regression tests
for pg_dump, I think the risk of breaking something is too high for
this phase of the release cycle.

I plan to set the unfinished code aside for now, and come back to it
early in the 7.1 cycle.  We'll have to live with the ordering issue
for another release.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Don Baccus
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] interesting observatation regarding views and V7.0