Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples
Date
Msg-id 27957.951803062@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-sql
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
>> This is really an unfortunate case where someone should have read the SQL
>> standard before putting in a feature. The SQL keyword is TEMPORARY, and
>> TEMP is really a popular name for a dummy table.

> So why not yank TEMP and require TEMPORARY?

Probably we ought to stop to ask why TEMP is in there to begin with;
perhaps for compatibility with some other RDBMS?

If not, I'd vote for pulling it out.  That's a heck of a poor word to
reserve.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh