Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples
Date
Msg-id 38BB5D9C.ED50B126@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples  (Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE>)
List pgsql-sql
> > Postgres thinks that TEMP is a keyword, so it won't take it as a table
> > name unless you put quotes around it.
> This is really an unfortunate case where someone should have read the SQL
> standard before putting in a feature. The SQL keyword is TEMPORARY, and
> TEMP is really a popular name for a dummy table.

So why not yank TEMP and require TEMPORARY? Saving an extra 5
characters of typing is not a good enough reason to keep it imho, and
if the SQL92 standard requires a particular form why bother extending
it?

A major release is a good time to adjust syntax to promote
compliance...
                     - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiples