On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > > Postgres thinks that TEMP is a keyword, so it won't take it as a table
> > > name unless you put quotes around it.
> > This is really an unfortunate case where someone should have read the SQL
> > standard before putting in a feature. The SQL keyword is TEMPORARY, and
> > TEMP is really a popular name for a dummy table.
>
> So why not yank TEMP and require TEMPORARY? Saving an extra 5
> characters of typing is not a good enough reason to keep it imho, and
> if the SQL92 standard requires a particular form why bother extending
> it?
>
> A major release is a good time to adjust syntax to promote
> compliance...
I've been (lightly) bashed in the past for proposing such things (see
END/ABORT) but I'm with you. I think that TEMP may be far too wide-spread
by now, though.
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
