At 11:40 PM 2/27/00 -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>Okay, just curious here, but ... what you are proposing *sounds* to me
>like half-way to what started this thread. (*Please* correct me if I'm
>wrong) ...
>
>Essentially, in your proposal, when you drop a column, all subsequent
>tuples inserted/updated would have ... that one column missing? So,
>instead of doing a massive sweep through the table and removing that
>column, only do it when an insert/update happens?
>
>Basically, eliminate the requirement to re-write every tuples, only those
>that have activity?
Yes, this was one of the ideas that cropped up in previous discussion.
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert
Serviceand other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.
