Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?
Date
Msg-id 38ADFB2A.84FF7EA9@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL compliance, was Re: [HACKERS] follow-up on PC Week Labsbenchmark results  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
> I got the impression from the paragraph that followed that we don't
> and the first query I tried bounced from commandline
> So assumed it was handled in psql when in interactive mode.

Yuck. They *were* talking about InterBase, but you're right!

Didn't realize that scan.l had lost (or never did have) the right
stuff. Will be fixed before we're out of beta...
                   - Tom

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: SQL compliance - why -- comments only at psql level ?