Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chris
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 38997D1C.9F353FED@bitmead.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Oops:

>         test=> drop index i_test;
>         DROP
>         test=> select relhasindex from pg_class where relname = 'test';
>          relhasindex
>         -------------
>          t
>         (1 row)
> 
> Let me add that to the TODO list.

Why not change that to a relnumindexes as well? Easier to maintain and
more useful information.

> > >Could you do that for relhassubclass?
> >
> > If we made it relnumsubclasses and incremented/decremented on
> > CREATE/DROP, it seems easy in theory.
> 
> Yes, that would work.  Seems hasindex has problems.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL